July 4, 2026

July, 4, 2026
July 4, 2026

give

untitled artwork

untitled artwork

World news biblically understood

TRENDING:

Progressive Ideology Is Directly At Odds With America’s Founding Principles, Clarence Thomas Warns

Justice Clarence Thomas is celebrating America’s 250th birthday by urging Americans to return to our nation’s founding principles.

Thomas has been one of the U.S. Supreme Court’s most steadfast constitutionalist judges since being nominated to the Court by former President George H.W. Bush in 1991.

Now the Court’s fourth longest-serving justice, Thomas was famous for his 17 years of near silence on the bench during the Court’s oral arguments, stating he doesn’t find them particularly helpful. Of course, Thomas made his thoughts perfectly clear in numerous well-written and convincing opinions in his 34 years on the high Court.

Now, Thomas is boldly speaking out, urging Americans to return to our nation’s founding principles found in the Constitution and Declaration of Independence.

Justice Thomas recently spoke at the University of Texas, Austin to preview the 250th anniversary of the signing of the Declaration.

“The Constitution is the means of government; it is the Declaration that announces the ends of government,” Justice Thomas stated. “The Constitution achieves this purpose by protecting our natural rights and liberties from concentrated power and excessive democracy.”

He warned about how progressive ideology – introduced to Americans in the 20th century – is at odds with our nation’s founding principles.

“As we meet today, it is unclear whether these principles will endure,” Thomas forewarned, giving a brief history lesson: “At the beginning of the 20th century, a new set of first principles of government was introduced into the American mainstream. The proponents of this new set of first principles, most prominently among them the 28th president, Woodrow Wilson, called it progressivism. Since Wilson’s presidency, progressivism has made many inroads in our system of government and our way of life. It has coexisted uneasily with the principles of the Declaration. Because it is opposed to those principles, it is not possible for the two to coexist forever.”

Early progressives viewed America’s commitment to limited government, natural rights and equality as impediments to “more advanced and sophisticated” forms of government, Thomas shared.

These progressives preferred to concentrate power in the hands of a well-educate, elite class of society, rather than diffuse it among the people, and rejected the Declaration’s acknowledgment of self-evident natural rights that preexist governments and are granted by God – rights that are “endowed by their Creator” – in the words of the Declaration, penned by former President Thomas Jefferson.

For these individuals like Wilson and John Dewey, “Liberty no longer preceded the government as a gift from God, but was to be enjoyed at the grace of the government,” Thomas summarized. “Progressivism seeks to replace the basic premises of the Declaration of Independence, and hence our form of government.”

For this reason, the American people face a time of choosing. We can choose the philosophy of government adopted at our nation’s founding: constitutionalism. Or we can continue down the Wilsonian path: progressivism.

Thomas quoted from former President Calvin Coolidge, who on the 150th anniversary of the Declaration, pointed out that “progress” beyond our nation’s founding principles is not progress at all: “If all men are created equal, that is final. If they are endowed with inalienable rights, that is final. If governments derive their just powers from the consent of the governed, that is final. No advance, no progress can be made beyond these propositions. If anyone wishes to deny their truth or their soundness, the only direction in which he can proceed historically is not forward, but backward toward the time when there was no equality, no rights of the individual, no rule of the people.”

We thank Justice Thomas for the boldness and clarity of his remarks. As our nation approaches its 250th birthday, we must heed Justice Thomas’ warning and recommit ourselves to our nation’s founding principles.

As Andrew Walker writes in WORLD, “If America is to regain the Christian imagination it had at its beginnings, it cannot be progressive.”


DONOR SUPPORTED: Harbinger’s Daily publishes Biblically-centered news in more than 125 countries every day at no cost to the reader.

The Real ‘American Dream’ Of George Washington Was Far More God-Honoring Than Many Have Been Led To Believe

Washington personally read the Bible and quoted the Bible. Those who deny America’s unique Christian roots will claim that many educated people in positions of prominence in the 18th century also quoted from the Bible. However, they also quoted from Greek and Roman authors of antiquity. Washington quoted almost exclusively from the Bible and applied its teachings to his personal life and role as a leader. The real American dream is far more God-honoring than what we have today. The true American patriot is working and praying that Washington’s vision for America will once again claim the hearts of Americans.

The Absurdity Of Gender Ideology: NBC News Places Trigger Warning On The Terms ‘Biological Male’ and ‘Biological Female’

Woke knows no limits on crazy. It seems every week brings new examples of how unstable some liberal minds can be. This week did not disappoint. On June 30th, the morning the United States Supreme Court handed down its landmark decision protecting female high school and college athletes from male intrusion, the NBC News’ TODAY show found it necessary to provide viewers with a trigger warning for why they were using the terms “biological male” and “biological female.”

sign up

Thomas Jefferson’s ‘Separation Of Church And State’ Never Meant Keeping God Out Of Government

In context, it’s clear this wall of separation was not created to keep religion out of the State. It was simply intended to protect religious freedom and to place boundaries on the State’s control over the Church. In fact, the United States Capitol served as a church building for seven decades and Jefferson himself was a regular attendee. He attended so faithfully that he earned a reserved seat. On the Sunday after he wrote the letter to the Danbury Baptists, he attended church services at the still-under-construction Capitol.

ABC's of Salvation

Decision

UTT

FOI

untitled artwork

Israel My Glory

Justice Clarence Thomas is celebrating America’s 250th birthday by urging Americans to return to our nation’s founding principles.

Thomas has been one of the U.S. Supreme Court’s most steadfast constitutionalist judges since being nominated to the Court by former President George H.W. Bush in 1991.

Now the Court’s fourth longest-serving justice, Thomas was famous for his 17 years of near silence on the bench during the Court’s oral arguments, stating he doesn’t find them particularly helpful. Of course, Thomas made his thoughts perfectly clear in numerous well-written and convincing opinions in his 34 years on the high Court.

Now, Thomas is boldly speaking out, urging Americans to return to our nation’s founding principles found in the Constitution and Declaration of Independence.

Justice Thomas recently spoke at the University of Texas, Austin to preview the 250th anniversary of the signing of the Declaration.

“The Constitution is the means of government; it is the Declaration that announces the ends of government,” Justice Thomas stated. “The Constitution achieves this purpose by protecting our natural rights and liberties from concentrated power and excessive democracy.”

He warned about how progressive ideology – introduced to Americans in the 20th century – is at odds with our nation’s founding principles.

“As we meet today, it is unclear whether these principles will endure,” Thomas forewarned, giving a brief history lesson: “At the beginning of the 20th century, a new set of first principles of government was introduced into the American mainstream. The proponents of this new set of first principles, most prominently among them the 28th president, Woodrow Wilson, called it progressivism. Since Wilson’s presidency, progressivism has made many inroads in our system of government and our way of life. It has coexisted uneasily with the principles of the Declaration. Because it is opposed to those principles, it is not possible for the two to coexist forever.”

Early progressives viewed America’s commitment to limited government, natural rights and equality as impediments to “more advanced and sophisticated” forms of government, Thomas shared.

These progressives preferred to concentrate power in the hands of a well-educate, elite class of society, rather than diffuse it among the people, and rejected the Declaration’s acknowledgment of self-evident natural rights that preexist governments and are granted by God – rights that are “endowed by their Creator” – in the words of the Declaration, penned by former President Thomas Jefferson.

For these individuals like Wilson and John Dewey, “Liberty no longer preceded the government as a gift from God, but was to be enjoyed at the grace of the government,” Thomas summarized. “Progressivism seeks to replace the basic premises of the Declaration of Independence, and hence our form of government.”

For this reason, the American people face a time of choosing. We can choose the philosophy of government adopted at our nation’s founding: constitutionalism. Or we can continue down the Wilsonian path: progressivism.

Thomas quoted from former President Calvin Coolidge, who on the 150th anniversary of the Declaration, pointed out that “progress” beyond our nation’s founding principles is not progress at all: “If all men are created equal, that is final. If they are endowed with inalienable rights, that is final. If governments derive their just powers from the consent of the governed, that is final. No advance, no progress can be made beyond these propositions. If anyone wishes to deny their truth or their soundness, the only direction in which he can proceed historically is not forward, but backward toward the time when there was no equality, no rights of the individual, no rule of the people.”

We thank Justice Thomas for the boldness and clarity of his remarks. As our nation approaches its 250th birthday, we must heed Justice Thomas’ warning and recommit ourselves to our nation’s founding principles.

As Andrew Walker writes in WORLD, “If America is to regain the Christian imagination it had at its beginnings, it cannot be progressive.”


Trusted Analysis From A Biblical Worldview

Help reach the lost and equip the church with the living and active truth of God's Word in our world today.

YOU CARE ABOUT

BIBLICAL TRUTH. SO DO WE.

 

Together, We Can Deliver A Biblical Understanding

Of News Events Around The World.

The Real ‘American Dream’ Of George Washington Was Far More God-Honoring Than Many Have Been Led To Believe

Washington personally read the Bible and quoted the Bible. Those who deny America’s unique Christian roots will claim that many educated people in positions of prominence in the 18th century also quoted from the Bible. However, they also quoted from Greek and Roman authors of antiquity. Washington quoted almost exclusively from the Bible and applied its teachings to his personal life and role as a leader. The real American dream is far more God-honoring than what we have today. The true American patriot is working and praying that Washington’s vision for America will once again claim the hearts of Americans.

The Absurdity Of Gender Ideology: NBC News Places Trigger Warning On The Terms ‘Biological Male’ and ‘Biological Female’

Woke knows no limits on crazy. It seems every week brings new examples of how unstable some liberal minds can be. This week did not disappoint. On June 30th, the morning the United States Supreme Court handed down its landmark decision protecting female high school and college athletes from male intrusion, the NBC News’ TODAY show found it necessary to provide viewers with a trigger warning for why they were using the terms “biological male” and “biological female.”

untitled artwork 6391

Thomas Jefferson’s ‘Separation Of Church And State’ Never Meant Keeping God Out Of Government

In context, it’s clear this wall of separation was not created to keep religion out of the State. It was simply intended to protect religious freedom and to place boundaries on the State’s control over the Church. In fact, the United States Capitol served as a church building for seven decades and Jefferson himself was a regular attendee. He attended so faithfully that he earned a reserved seat. On the Sunday after he wrote the letter to the Danbury Baptists, he attended church services at the still-under-construction Capitol.

ABC's of Salvation

TV AD

worldview matters

Decision Magazine V AD

Decision

Jan Markell

Israel My Glory

Erick Stakelbeck

untitled artwork

YOU CARE ABOUT

BIBLICAL TRUTH.

SO DO WE.

Together, We Can Deliver A Biblical Understanding Of News Events Around The World And Equip The Church To Stand With A Biblical Worldview.

untitled artwork

Israel My Glory

YOU CARE ABOUT

BIBLICAL TRUTH.

SO DO WE.

 

Together, We Can Deliver A Biblical Understanding Of News Events Around The World And Equip The Church To Stand With A Biblical Worldview.