September 5, 2026

September, 5, 2026
September 5, 2026

give

untitled artwork

untitled artwork

World news biblically understood

TRENDING:

Why Lasting Peace Is Out Of Reach: A Look At The Oslo Accords—And Why They Failed

The past often explains the present. This rings especially true in regards to the questions many have concerning Israel and the Palestinians. Where did the Palestinian Authority come from and when? How does Hamas feature in past attempts at peace negotiations between Israel and the Palestinians? What significance is attached to the areas of Gaza and the West Bank (Biblically known as Judea and Samaria)? To answer these questions and more, we need to examine a crucial period of negotiations for peace known as the Oslo Accords.

The Hope of Oslo I

The first round of these agreements was negotiated secretly from 1992 to 1993 between representatives of Israel, including Foreign Minister Shimon Peres, and representatives of the Palestine Liberation Organisation (PLO). The first agreement, Oslo I, was signed on September 13, 1993, by Israeli Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin and PLO Chairman Yasser Arafat. It affirmed recognition of the State of Israel and Palestinian self-governance, paving the way for a two-state solution. It also provided for the withdrawal of Israeli security forces and transfer of authority to the newly created Palestinian Authority (PA). Also, it included a five-year transitional period for Palestinian self-governance, as well as ongoing negotiations on multiple other issues.

To mark this seemingly significant achievement for peace, the three primary participants, Rabin, Peres, and Arafat, were awarded the Nobel Peace Prize in late 1994. Unfortunately, the Accords failed to deliver peace.

The Doom of Oslo II

The second round of negotiations continued, despite attempts by religious opponents on both sides to disrupt them, primarily Hamas on the Palestinian side. The talks resulted in the signing of the Oslo II Accords by Rabin, Peres, and Arafat on September 28, 1995. Oslo II was more detailed than its predecessor and provided for Palestinians to elect representatives to govern the PA, further redeployment of Israeli security forces, creation of three zones (Areas A, B, and C) within the West Bank and Gaza, and future negotiations on outstanding issues with a permanent resolution by May 4, 1999.

The Oslo Accords came to an end because of the killing of 29 Palestinians in Hebron in February 1994, the assassination of Rabin by an Israeli extremist in November 1995, continuing violence against Jewish Israelis by Hamas, and the Second Intifada by the Palestinians following Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon’s visit to the Temple Mount in September 2000. In reality, the dream of peace was just that—a dream—and was destined to fail because the majority of Palestinians did not support the process and outcomes of the Accords. Israel was also wary of its close proximity to security threats from a jihadist population that was determined to eliminate it.

The Destruction That Followed

It seemed that the Accords would benefit Israel through the Palestinian commitment to recognize the Jewish state’s right of existence. But the increased legitimacy of the Palestinian people and leadership with the creation of the Palestinian Authority only served to strengthen their position in demanding concessions from Israel in the international arena.

The United Nations had previously recognized the PLO as a representative of the Palestinian people, then designated as Palestine in 1988, and in November 2012, it gave Palestine non-member observer state status in response to an application from PA President Mahmoud Abbas. By 2024, the UN passed a motion affirming that Palestine met the requirement for UN membership, which did not result in admission because of a previous U.S. veto in the security council. The Palestinians’ growing prominence provided a platform to attack Israel and attempt to delegitimize its possession of territory rightfully gained by purchase and spoils of defensive wars. 

Rather than producing greater support for peace, negotiations between Israel and the Palestinians provoked increased antagonism from the general Palestinian population, which considered Hamas more aligned with its position of resistance against the Israeli “colonizers.” Thus, Hamas increased its influence in comparison to the Palestinian Authority, which led to its takeover of Gaza from Fatah in 2006 after Israel’s total withdrawal in 2005. Hamas then used billions of dollars in aid funds to build a military base to attack Israel from Gaza, resulting in the horrific massacre of 1,200 Israelis on October 7, 2023.

Behind this intense and persistent hatred of Israel is a spiritual war between Satan and God. God’s redemptive plan includes the future salvation of Israel (Romans 11) in fulfillment of the promises made to Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob (Genesis 12:1–3, 7; 15:1–21; 26:1–5; 35:9–15), then to David (2 Samuel 7:1–17) and in the New Covenant (Jeremiah 31:31–40; Ezekiel 36:22–38). Satan has attempted to thwart God’s plan by eliminating God’s Chosen People many times throughout history through many proxies—from Haman to Hitler to Hamas. He will not succeed, but his incitement of hatred will continue and grow even more hostile through the Antichrist in the coming Tribulation.

Christians ought to pray for the peace of Jerusalem (Psalm 122:6), but we must also realize that only in the coming of the Prince of Peace will lasting peace occur for Jerusalem, Israel, and the nations.


Millions Are Understanding The News Through A Biblical Worldview

THANKS TO YOUR PRAYER AND SUPPORT

Exposing A Culture That Has Renamed Evil As ‘Mercy’

What we discuss today should make you very upset. The Lindsay Clancy trial is not about whether or not a murderer is on trial. It’s a trial on “mental health,” something entirely different and completely divorced from reality. Let’s begin with an important fact: There aren't versions of the truth—”your truth” vs “my truth”—there is just the truth. Lindsay Clancy is responsible for the death of her children. End of story. Full stop. Videos across Social media are showing women holding plastic baby dolls, making light of casually harming their own children—moms tossing their fake babies over banisters, bashing their heads into doorposts, and putting them in dryers and dishwashers. The caption of one of the videos depicting the harming of infants reads: “postpartum depression got me like…”

Mother Appeals To Supreme Court After Being Barred From Taking Her Daughter To Calvary Chapels, Exposing Her To The Bible

In December 2024, the Portland District Court ruled that Ava’s father, Matthew Bradeen, would have full control over all religious attendances, including “the right to make final decisions regarding [the daughter’s] participation in other churches and religious organizations.” The court ruled that there had been “no showing of harm to [the child] associated with a belief system that is rooted in the Bible” but found issue with the Biblical teachings of eternal salvation, Heaven, hell, angels and demons as well as teaching the Bible “verse by verse, chapter by chapter.” The Maine Supreme Court ruled that a mother cannot take her 13-year-old daughter to church and cannot “expose” her to any “religious philosophy or the Bible in general” without the approval of the daughter’s father. The mother, Emily Bickford, is seeking an intervention from the U.S. Supreme Court.

sign up

‘A Firm Reliance On The Protection Of Divine Providence’: Finding The Way Back As One Nation Under God

It is no secret that America has largely turned its back on God. Children are encouraged to find their own truth from a young age, and mentions of God in our public schools are brushed aside or removed. Church attendance is rapidly declining as self-help strategies promise the answers to life’s problems. We’ve traded Divine guidance for subjective truth—“it’s up to me decide what is right and wrong.” And even the concept of biological sex and gender is up to the preference of each individual. It is clear that secularism has infiltrated every aspect of society, and the results are catastrophic. The further we stray from God, the deeper we sink into hopelessness.

ABC's of Salvation

Decision

UTT

FOI

untitled artwork

Israel My Glory

The past often explains the present. This rings especially true in regards to the questions many have concerning Israel and the Palestinians. Where did the Palestinian Authority come from and when? How does Hamas feature in past attempts at peace negotiations between Israel and the Palestinians? What significance is attached to the areas of Gaza and the West Bank (Biblically known as Judea and Samaria)? To answer these questions and more, we need to examine a crucial period of negotiations for peace known as the Oslo Accords.

The Hope of Oslo I

The first round of these agreements was negotiated secretly from 1992 to 1993 between representatives of Israel, including Foreign Minister Shimon Peres, and representatives of the Palestine Liberation Organisation (PLO). The first agreement, Oslo I, was signed on September 13, 1993, by Israeli Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin and PLO Chairman Yasser Arafat. It affirmed recognition of the State of Israel and Palestinian self-governance, paving the way for a two-state solution. It also provided for the withdrawal of Israeli security forces and transfer of authority to the newly created Palestinian Authority (PA). Also, it included a five-year transitional period for Palestinian self-governance, as well as ongoing negotiations on multiple other issues.

To mark this seemingly significant achievement for peace, the three primary participants, Rabin, Peres, and Arafat, were awarded the Nobel Peace Prize in late 1994. Unfortunately, the Accords failed to deliver peace.

The Doom of Oslo II

The second round of negotiations continued, despite attempts by religious opponents on both sides to disrupt them, primarily Hamas on the Palestinian side. The talks resulted in the signing of the Oslo II Accords by Rabin, Peres, and Arafat on September 28, 1995. Oslo II was more detailed than its predecessor and provided for Palestinians to elect representatives to govern the PA, further redeployment of Israeli security forces, creation of three zones (Areas A, B, and C) within the West Bank and Gaza, and future negotiations on outstanding issues with a permanent resolution by May 4, 1999.

The Oslo Accords came to an end because of the killing of 29 Palestinians in Hebron in February 1994, the assassination of Rabin by an Israeli extremist in November 1995, continuing violence against Jewish Israelis by Hamas, and the Second Intifada by the Palestinians following Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon’s visit to the Temple Mount in September 2000. In reality, the dream of peace was just that—a dream—and was destined to fail because the majority of Palestinians did not support the process and outcomes of the Accords. Israel was also wary of its close proximity to security threats from a jihadist population that was determined to eliminate it.

The Destruction That Followed

It seemed that the Accords would benefit Israel through the Palestinian commitment to recognize the Jewish state’s right of existence. But the increased legitimacy of the Palestinian people and leadership with the creation of the Palestinian Authority only served to strengthen their position in demanding concessions from Israel in the international arena.

The United Nations had previously recognized the PLO as a representative of the Palestinian people, then designated as Palestine in 1988, and in November 2012, it gave Palestine non-member observer state status in response to an application from PA President Mahmoud Abbas. By 2024, the UN passed a motion affirming that Palestine met the requirement for UN membership, which did not result in admission because of a previous U.S. veto in the security council. The Palestinians’ growing prominence provided a platform to attack Israel and attempt to delegitimize its possession of territory rightfully gained by purchase and spoils of defensive wars. 

Rather than producing greater support for peace, negotiations between Israel and the Palestinians provoked increased antagonism from the general Palestinian population, which considered Hamas more aligned with its position of resistance against the Israeli “colonizers.” Thus, Hamas increased its influence in comparison to the Palestinian Authority, which led to its takeover of Gaza from Fatah in 2006 after Israel’s total withdrawal in 2005. Hamas then used billions of dollars in aid funds to build a military base to attack Israel from Gaza, resulting in the horrific massacre of 1,200 Israelis on October 7, 2023.

Behind this intense and persistent hatred of Israel is a spiritual war between Satan and God. God’s redemptive plan includes the future salvation of Israel (Romans 11) in fulfillment of the promises made to Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob (Genesis 12:1–3, 7; 15:1–21; 26:1–5; 35:9–15), then to David (2 Samuel 7:1–17) and in the New Covenant (Jeremiah 31:31–40; Ezekiel 36:22–38). Satan has attempted to thwart God’s plan by eliminating God’s Chosen People many times throughout history through many proxies—from Haman to Hitler to Hamas. He will not succeed, but his incitement of hatred will continue and grow even more hostile through the Antichrist in the coming Tribulation.

Christians ought to pray for the peace of Jerusalem (Psalm 122:6), but we must also realize that only in the coming of the Prince of Peace will lasting peace occur for Jerusalem, Israel, and the nations.


Trusted Analysis From A Biblical Worldview

Help reach the lost and equip the church with the living and active truth of God's Word in our world today.

YOU CARE ABOUT

BIBLICAL TRUTH. SO DO WE.

 

Together, We Can Deliver A Biblical Understanding

Of News Events Around The World.

Exposing A Culture That Has Renamed Evil As ‘Mercy’

What we discuss today should make you very upset. The Lindsay Clancy trial is not about whether or not a murderer is on trial. It’s a trial on “mental health,” something entirely different and completely divorced from reality. Let’s begin with an important fact: There aren't versions of the truth—”your truth” vs “my truth”—there is just the truth. Lindsay Clancy is responsible for the death of her children. End of story. Full stop. Videos across Social media are showing women holding plastic baby dolls, making light of casually harming their own children—moms tossing their fake babies over banisters, bashing their heads into doorposts, and putting them in dryers and dishwashers. The caption of one of the videos depicting the harming of infants reads: “postpartum depression got me like…”

Mother Appeals To Supreme Court After Being Barred From Taking Her Daughter To Calvary Chapels, Exposing Her To The Bible

In December 2024, the Portland District Court ruled that Ava’s father, Matthew Bradeen, would have full control over all religious attendances, including “the right to make final decisions regarding [the daughter’s] participation in other churches and religious organizations.” The court ruled that there had been “no showing of harm to [the child] associated with a belief system that is rooted in the Bible” but found issue with the Biblical teachings of eternal salvation, Heaven, hell, angels and demons as well as teaching the Bible “verse by verse, chapter by chapter.” The Maine Supreme Court ruled that a mother cannot take her 13-year-old daughter to church and cannot “expose” her to any “religious philosophy or the Bible in general” without the approval of the daughter’s father. The mother, Emily Bickford, is seeking an intervention from the U.S. Supreme Court.

untitled artwork 6391

‘A Firm Reliance On The Protection Of Divine Providence’: Finding The Way Back As One Nation Under God

It is no secret that America has largely turned its back on God. Children are encouraged to find their own truth from a young age, and mentions of God in our public schools are brushed aside or removed. Church attendance is rapidly declining as self-help strategies promise the answers to life’s problems. We’ve traded Divine guidance for subjective truth—“it’s up to me decide what is right and wrong.” And even the concept of biological sex and gender is up to the preference of each individual. It is clear that secularism has infiltrated every aspect of society, and the results are catastrophic. The further we stray from God, the deeper we sink into hopelessness.

ABC's of Salvation

TV AD

worldview matters

Decision Magazine V AD

Decision

Jan Markell

Israel My Glory

Erick Stakelbeck

untitled artwork

YOU CARE ABOUT

BIBLICAL TRUTH.

SO DO WE.

Together, We Can Deliver A Biblical Understanding Of News Events Around The World And Equip The Church To Stand With A Biblical Worldview.

untitled artwork

Israel My Glory

YOU CARE ABOUT

BIBLICAL TRUTH.

SO DO WE.

 

Together, We Can Deliver A Biblical Understanding Of News Events Around The World And Equip The Church To Stand With A Biblical Worldview.