giv

The Maine Supreme Court ruled that a mother cannot take her 13-year-old daughter to church and cannot “expose” her to any “religious philosophy or the Bible in general” without the approval of the daughter’s father. The mother, Emily Bickford, is seeking an intervention from the U.S. Supreme Court. 

The Maine Supreme Court backed a lower court ruling which concluded that Bickford, who has primary custody over her daughter, Ava, is a fit parent—except in religious instruction. 

In December 2024, the Portland District Court ruled that Ava’s father, Matthew Bradeen, would have full control over all religious attendances, including “the right to make final decisions regarding [the daughter’s] participation in other churches and religious organizations.” The court ruled that there had been “no showing of harm to [the child] associated with a belief system that is rooted in the Bible” but found issue with the Biblical teachings of eternal salvation, Heaven, hell, angels and demons as well as teaching the Bible “verse by verse, chapter by chapter.”

Though Ava and Bickford have suggested different church options to him, Bradeen has rejected all requests since December 2024. 

Under the order, Bickford has been unable to take Ava to church, any religious event or organization, or to Christmas or Easter services. Bickford is also not permitted to read the Bible or religious materials to Ava, and Ava has been barred from contacting church friends at her home church, Calvary Chapel in Portland. Bickford cannot take her to “any services, gatherings, or events associated with Calvary Chapel” and or expose her to “material, literature, video, or other messaging associated with, or created or published by, Calvary Chapel.”

Liberty Counsel, which is representing Bickford in the case, appealed the district court’s ruling. In November 2025, the case went to the Maine Supreme Court for an oral argument, and the court announced the ruling Tuesday.

Mat Staver, Liberty Counsel founder and chairman, who legally represented Bickford before the Maine Supreme Court, says the ruling is clearly unconstitutional. 

“This opinion rejects the First Amendment right of a fit parent to raise her child consistent with her Christian faith,” Staver said. “This opinion goes against other state court decisions involving custody in the context of religious free exercise rights and ignores precedent from the U.S. Supreme Court.”

The custody dispute around Ava’s religious upbringing occurred when Bradeen found out that Ava desired to be baptized. Ava, who attended Calvary Chapel Church at the time, had become a Christian in 2021. Bickford had become a Christian about 4 years earlier. Bradeen took issue with how the church taught the Scriptures and hired Dr. Janja Lalich, a sociologist recognized as an expert on cults, to testify before the court. Because the pastor spoke with authority and said the messages he spoke from Scripture was objective truth, Lalich called the church a “cultic” organization. She claimed that, because cults are branded by a charismatic leader who teaches a “transcendent belief system” that offers answers and promises “some sort of salvation,” Calvary Chapel Church was a cult. 

Staver in a press release stated that Liberty Counsel “will petition the U.S. Supreme Court to ultimately decide this case.”

 “And somehow the Maine Supreme Court thinks this court order does not violate her rights as a fit parent and her Free Exercise rights under the First Amendment,” Staver said. “This disappointing opinion from the Maine Supreme Court prohibits Bickford from taking her child to a Christian church because the child’s father objects to its Biblical teachings. Depriving one parent their right to instill their religious views into their child and granting sole authority to the other parent fails to give proper protection to parental rights and religious freedom under the First Amendment. The implications of this opinion pose a serious threat to religious freedom.”

Relevant Scripture: Psalm 78:4, Proverbs 22:6, Ephesians 6:4


Watch LIVE Election Night Coverage Tuesday, November 3 at 8 pm ET | 5 pm PT

Election Night Coverage From A Biblical Worldview 

SIGN UP FREE FOR REAL LIFE NETWORK 

Stream Real Life Network directly from your TV. Available on all major smart TVs, mobile devices, and streaming platforms.

Stream Real Life Network directly from your TV. Available on all major smart TVs, mobile devices, and streaming platforms.

SIGN UP FREE FOR REAL LIFE NETWORK 

Stream Real Life Network directly from your TV. Available on all major smart TVs, mobile devices, and streaming platforms.

Stream Real Life Network directly from your TV. Available on all major smart TVs, mobile devices, and streaming platforms.

November 3, 2026

Watch LIVE Election Night Coverage Tuesday, November 3 at 8 pm ET | 5 pm PT

Election Night Coverage From A Biblical Worldview 

Stream Real Life Network for free directly on your TV. Available on all major smart TVs, mobile devices, and streaming platforms.

Stream Real Life Network directly from your TV. Available on all major smart TVs, mobile devices, and streaming platforms.

November, 3, 2026

untitled artwork

untitled artwork

World news biblically understood

TRENDING:

Mother Appeals To Supreme Court After Being Barred From Taking Her Daughter To Calvary Chapels, Exposing Her To The Bible

The Maine Supreme Court ruled that a mother cannot take her 13-year-old daughter to church and cannot “expose” her to any “religious philosophy or the Bible in general” without the approval of the daughter’s father. The mother, Emily Bickford, is seeking an intervention from the U.S. Supreme Court. 

The Maine Supreme Court backed a lower court ruling which concluded that Bickford, who has primary custody over her daughter, Ava, is a fit parent—except in religious instruction. 

In December 2024, the Portland District Court ruled that Ava’s father, Matthew Bradeen, would have full control over all religious attendances, including “the right to make final decisions regarding [the daughter’s] participation in other churches and religious organizations.” The court ruled that there had been “no showing of harm to [the child] associated with a belief system that is rooted in the Bible” but found issue with the Biblical teachings of eternal salvation, Heaven, hell, angels and demons as well as teaching the Bible “verse by verse, chapter by chapter.”

Though Ava and Bickford have suggested different church options to him, Bradeen has rejected all requests since December 2024. 

Under the order, Bickford has been unable to take Ava to church, any religious event or organization, or to Christmas or Easter services. Bickford is also not permitted to read the Bible or religious materials to Ava, and Ava has been barred from contacting church friends at her home church, Calvary Chapel in Portland. Bickford cannot take her to “any services, gatherings, or events associated with Calvary Chapel” and or expose her to “material, literature, video, or other messaging associated with, or created or published by, Calvary Chapel.”

Liberty Counsel, which is representing Bickford in the case, appealed the district court’s ruling. In November 2025, the case went to the Maine Supreme Court for an oral argument, and the court announced the ruling Tuesday.

Mat Staver, Liberty Counsel founder and chairman, who legally represented Bickford before the Maine Supreme Court, says the ruling is clearly unconstitutional. 

“This opinion rejects the First Amendment right of a fit parent to raise her child consistent with her Christian faith,” Staver said. “This opinion goes against other state court decisions involving custody in the context of religious free exercise rights and ignores precedent from the U.S. Supreme Court.”

The custody dispute around Ava’s religious upbringing occurred when Bradeen found out that Ava desired to be baptized. Ava, who attended Calvary Chapel Church at the time, had become a Christian in 2021. Bickford had become a Christian about 4 years earlier. Bradeen took issue with how the church taught the Scriptures and hired Dr. Janja Lalich, a sociologist recognized as an expert on cults, to testify before the court. Because the pastor spoke with authority and said the messages he spoke from Scripture was objective truth, Lalich called the church a “cultic” organization. She claimed that, because cults are branded by a charismatic leader who teaches a “transcendent belief system” that offers answers and promises “some sort of salvation,” Calvary Chapel Church was a cult. 

Staver in a press release stated that Liberty Counsel “will petition the U.S. Supreme Court to ultimately decide this case.”

 “And somehow the Maine Supreme Court thinks this court order does not violate her rights as a fit parent and her Free Exercise rights under the First Amendment,” Staver said. “This disappointing opinion from the Maine Supreme Court prohibits Bickford from taking her child to a Christian church because the child’s father objects to its Biblical teachings. Depriving one parent their right to instill their religious views into their child and granting sole authority to the other parent fails to give proper protection to parental rights and religious freedom under the First Amendment. The implications of this opinion pose a serious threat to religious freedom.”

Relevant Scripture: Psalm 78:4, Proverbs 22:6, Ephesians 6:4


Billy Graham: Voting Is A ‘God-Given Responsibility,’ And A Means To ‘Drive Back The Forces Of Evil’   

In the United States, Christians have the right to vote. “Millions [of people around] the world,” Billy Graham once reminded us, “do not know the meaning of this freedom.” At the voting booth, believers can support leaders who are committed to serving the public and standing for the unchanging truths found in God’s Word. Yet this freedom often goes unused. While turnout changes from one election to the next, research suggested that more than 40 percent of Christians did not vote in the last election. Throughout his life, Billy Graham encouraged believers to make their voices heard in politics. “The Bible plainly teaches that we are to participate in good citizenship and that we are to respect men in authority,” he said, “and we are to pray for those who govern us.” The evangelist considered voting a “God-given responsibility,” a means to “drive back the forces of evil.”

Why Christians Have A Biblical Responsibility To Participate In The Political Process

With the 2026 midterm elections just days away, millions of Americans are preparing to cast their ballots in an election that will have significant implications for the nation’s future. With control of Congress hanging in the balance, voters will help determine the legislative agenda and political trajectory of the next two years. For Christians, the election raises questions that go beyond political parties, candidates, and policy preferences. Is voting merely a civic privilege, or does Scripture provide a theological framework for understanding it as an act of stewardship and love of neighbor? And what role should pastors and churches play in equipping believers to exercise this responsibility faithfully? As Americans prepare to head to the polls next Tuesday, these questions invite us to consider a more fundamental issue: whether Christians have a Biblical responsibility to participate in the political process.

sign up

The Church Cannot Remain Silent On Biblical Matters Because They Have Been Declared ‘Political’

Jesus called His followers the salt of the earth and the light of the world. Neither image suggests withdrawal. Both describe engagement that makes a difference. So the issue is not whether the church should become political. It is whether Christians will remain biblical when biblical truth has political consequences. Our calling is neither to become the mouthpiece of a party nor to retreat into silence. It is to stand on God’s word, defend what is right, confront what is wrong, and speak with courage — even when the culture would rather we remain silent.

ABC's of Salvation

Decision

christ in prophecy

christ in prophecy

Decision

untitled artwork

Israel My Glory

The Maine Supreme Court ruled that a mother cannot take her 13-year-old daughter to church and cannot “expose” her to any “religious philosophy or the Bible in general” without the approval of the daughter’s father. The mother, Emily Bickford, is seeking an intervention from the U.S. Supreme Court. 

The Maine Supreme Court backed a lower court ruling which concluded that Bickford, who has primary custody over her daughter, Ava, is a fit parent—except in religious instruction. 

In December 2024, the Portland District Court ruled that Ava’s father, Matthew Bradeen, would have full control over all religious attendances, including “the right to make final decisions regarding [the daughter’s] participation in other churches and religious organizations.” The court ruled that there had been “no showing of harm to [the child] associated with a belief system that is rooted in the Bible” but found issue with the Biblical teachings of eternal salvation, Heaven, hell, angels and demons as well as teaching the Bible “verse by verse, chapter by chapter.”

Though Ava and Bickford have suggested different church options to him, Bradeen has rejected all requests since December 2024. 

Under the order, Bickford has been unable to take Ava to church, any religious event or organization, or to Christmas or Easter services. Bickford is also not permitted to read the Bible or religious materials to Ava, and Ava has been barred from contacting church friends at her home church, Calvary Chapel in Portland. Bickford cannot take her to “any services, gatherings, or events associated with Calvary Chapel” and or expose her to “material, literature, video, or other messaging associated with, or created or published by, Calvary Chapel.”

Liberty Counsel, which is representing Bickford in the case, appealed the district court’s ruling. In November 2025, the case went to the Maine Supreme Court for an oral argument, and the court announced the ruling Tuesday.

Mat Staver, Liberty Counsel founder and chairman, who legally represented Bickford before the Maine Supreme Court, says the ruling is clearly unconstitutional. 

“This opinion rejects the First Amendment right of a fit parent to raise her child consistent with her Christian faith,” Staver said. “This opinion goes against other state court decisions involving custody in the context of religious free exercise rights and ignores precedent from the U.S. Supreme Court.”

The custody dispute around Ava’s religious upbringing occurred when Bradeen found out that Ava desired to be baptized. Ava, who attended Calvary Chapel Church at the time, had become a Christian in 2021. Bickford had become a Christian about 4 years earlier. Bradeen took issue with how the church taught the Scriptures and hired Dr. Janja Lalich, a sociologist recognized as an expert on cults, to testify before the court. Because the pastor spoke with authority and said the messages he spoke from Scripture was objective truth, Lalich called the church a “cultic” organization. She claimed that, because cults are branded by a charismatic leader who teaches a “transcendent belief system” that offers answers and promises “some sort of salvation,” Calvary Chapel Church was a cult. 

Staver in a press release stated that Liberty Counsel “will petition the U.S. Supreme Court to ultimately decide this case.”

 “And somehow the Maine Supreme Court thinks this court order does not violate her rights as a fit parent and her Free Exercise rights under the First Amendment,” Staver said. “This disappointing opinion from the Maine Supreme Court prohibits Bickford from taking her child to a Christian church because the child’s father objects to its Biblical teachings. Depriving one parent their right to instill their religious views into their child and granting sole authority to the other parent fails to give proper protection to parental rights and religious freedom under the First Amendment. The implications of this opinion pose a serious threat to religious freedom.”

Relevant Scripture: Psalm 78:4, Proverbs 22:6, Ephesians 6:4


Trusted Analysis From A Biblical Worldview

Help reach the lost and equip the church with the living and active truth of God's Word in our world today.

YOU CARE ABOUT

BIBLICAL TRUTH. SO DO WE.

 

Together, We Can Deliver A Biblical Understanding

Of News Events Around The World.

Billy Graham: Voting Is A ‘God-Given Responsibility,’ And A Means To ‘Drive Back The Forces Of Evil’   

In the United States, Christians have the right to vote. “Millions [of people around] the world,” Billy Graham once reminded us, “do not know the meaning of this freedom.” At the voting booth, believers can support leaders who are committed to serving the public and standing for the unchanging truths found in God’s Word. Yet this freedom often goes unused. While turnout changes from one election to the next, research suggested that more than 40 percent of Christians did not vote in the last election. Throughout his life, Billy Graham encouraged believers to make their voices heard in politics. “The Bible plainly teaches that we are to participate in good citizenship and that we are to respect men in authority,” he said, “and we are to pray for those who govern us.” The evangelist considered voting a “God-given responsibility,” a means to “drive back the forces of evil.”

Why Christians Have A Biblical Responsibility To Participate In The Political Process

With the 2026 midterm elections just days away, millions of Americans are preparing to cast their ballots in an election that will have significant implications for the nation’s future. With control of Congress hanging in the balance, voters will help determine the legislative agenda and political trajectory of the next two years. For Christians, the election raises questions that go beyond political parties, candidates, and policy preferences. Is voting merely a civic privilege, or does Scripture provide a theological framework for understanding it as an act of stewardship and love of neighbor? And what role should pastors and churches play in equipping believers to exercise this responsibility faithfully? As Americans prepare to head to the polls next Tuesday, these questions invite us to consider a more fundamental issue: whether Christians have a Biblical responsibility to participate in the political process.

untitled artwork 6391

The Church Cannot Remain Silent On Biblical Matters Because They Have Been Declared ‘Political’

Jesus called His followers the salt of the earth and the light of the world. Neither image suggests withdrawal. Both describe engagement that makes a difference. So the issue is not whether the church should become political. It is whether Christians will remain biblical when biblical truth has political consequences. Our calling is neither to become the mouthpiece of a party nor to retreat into silence. It is to stand on God’s word, defend what is right, confront what is wrong, and speak with courage — even when the culture would rather we remain silent.

ABC's of Salvation

TV AD

worldview matters

Decision Magazine V AD

Decision

Jan Markell

Israel My Glory

Erick Stakelbeck

untitled artwork

YOU CARE ABOUT

BIBLICAL TRUTH.

SO DO WE.

Together, We Can Deliver A Biblical Understanding Of News Events Around The World And Equip The Church To Stand With A Biblical Worldview.

untitled artwork

Israel My Glory

YOU CARE ABOUT

BIBLICAL TRUTH.

SO DO WE.

 

Together, We Can Deliver A Biblical Understanding Of News Events Around The World And Equip The Church To Stand With A Biblical Worldview.