A Michigan county board stopped holding prayers before legislative meetings last month, and a Christian conservative legal organization argued that the board caved under incomplete information from a secularist nonprofit, despite the Supreme Court’s repeated approvals of the longstanding practice.

The Leelanau County Board of Commissioners voted 5-2 in January to remove the prayer portion of their meeting and replace it with a moment of silence after the Freedom From Religion Foundation (FFRF), which advocates for atheists, agnostics, and promotes the separation of church and state, sent them a letter in September urging them to end the practice.

“And can I say ‘Amen’ to that?” FFRF Co-President Annie Laurie Gaylor said in a news release after the decision. “We commend the hard work of our local activists who fought for inclusivity and the wisdom of the Leelanau County Board for listening.”

In the letter, FFRF wrote that some residents were concerned and had reported that the board recently started opening its meetings with Christian prayer. About 30% of Leelanau County residents identify as religiously unaffiliated, according to FFRF.

The letter stated that the board’s policy limited those who could deliver an invocation to those who represent an organization with an established presence in the county. FFRF argued that those limits ensured the prayers would be Christian, instead of other religious or nonreligious beliefs of those in Leelanau County.

“We write to the request [sic] that the Board end its prayer practice, either by replacing it with a moment of silence, or by removing it completely, in order to respect the views of all Leelanau County resident,” the letter added.

In response, the First Liberty Institute, a law firm dedicated to defending and restoring religious liberty, wrote its own letter to the board dated Tuesday, over concerns that they ended the practice based on an “inexcusably incomplete information and legal analysis,” from FFRF.

While both letters cited the 2014 Supreme Court case Town of Greece v. Galloway – in which the Court ruled that legislative bodies, like city councils, could begin meetings with prayer even if it favors a specific religion – the FFRF letter failed to disclose that the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit – in which Leelanau County sits – concluded that legislative invocations are permitted under the U.S. Constitution, whether led by chaplains, local volunteers, or elected officials.

Jeremy Dys, special counsel for litigation and communications at First Liberty, was blunt when writing about the omission from FFRF.

“This is controlling precedent for Leelanau County. Thus, it is inexplicable and outrageous that any attorney purporting to analyze the law on this topic would intentionally omit or accidentally ignore reference to County of Jackson,” Dys wrote in the letter, referring to Bormuth v. County of Jackson (2017).

“It’s like leaving out in a recipe for sweet tea, it’s like leaving out that you’re supposed to put sugar in it,” Dys told Fox News via phone. “It’s that atrocious.”

In the case of Town of Greece v. Galloway, the Court decided that the town of Greece, New York, may permit volunteer chaplains to open each legislative session with a prayer. The court ruled, 5-4, that prayers before the meeting did not violate the constitution prohibition against government establishment of religion.

In its letter, FFRF argued that a critical factor in the Court’s decision in finding the practice in Galloway did not violate the Constitution was because Greece “represented that it would welcome a prayer by any minister or layman who wished to give one.”

“The Supreme Court’s decision would have been different had the town used the prayer opportunity to discriminate against minority religions,” FFRF argued.

Dys said the Sixth Circuit decision gave the approval to have elected officials themselves lead such prayers. 

FFRF Staff Attorney Chris Lane released a statement to Fox News which read in part: “The County of Jackson v. Bormuth Sixth Circuit case referenced by First Liberty is relevant only to legislator-led prayer. That factual scenario was not at play in Leelanau County, where the prayers were slated to be delivered by religious leaders, not legislators. The Bormuth case is irrelevant to the situation at hand. The Supreme Court has deemed prayer at legislative meetings constitutional, and FFRF’s letter did not claim otherwise.”

“The Board did the right thing by its citizens in voting to halt the proposed prayer practice and instead schedule a moment of silence, which excludes no one. For an organization claiming to defend religious liberty for all Americans, First Liberty should be pleased that the Board opted to respect everyone’s religion (or irreligion),” the statement added. 

The Supreme Court also upheld legislative prayer in a case out of Nebraska nearly forty years ago. 

In that case, Marsh v. Chambers (1983), the Court noted that the “opening of sessions of legislative and other deliberative public bodies with prayer is deeply embedded in the history and tradition of this country,” and “has coexisted with the principles of disestablishment and religious freedom” since our founding.

Marsh specifically dealt with the practice of the Nebraska legislature to pay a chaplain to deliver legislative invocations ahead of its unicameral meetings. By approving the practice in the case, the Court approved that legislative bodies like the board can employ a chaplain who would, among other things, open public meetings with prayer. 

The Sixth Circuit reviewed the decisions of Marsh and Greece.

“We are unaware of the motivations giving rise to your decision,” Dys added in the letter to the board. “However, if the Commission based its decision solely upon the letter sent by FFRF, it did so based upon woefully incomplete information. In light of the information articulated herein, that decision should be reconsidered.

“Lawyers are supposed to give complete advice to those seeking counsel, not push a political agenda.  FFRF inexcusably left out multiple, critical cases that unequivocally approve of legislative prayer and then twisted Town of Greece—a case that approves of religious leaders leading legislative prayer—in order to push this county commission into adopting the conclusion FFRF wanted. Now that Leelanau County has more complete information, they are free to make whatever decision they think best and their voters approve,” he told Fox News. 

HD Editor’s Note: Why Is This News Biblically Relevant?

Ken Ham in response to the Freedom From Religion Foundation’s bully campaign to remove prayer from the meeting, warned that those advocating for secularism are anything but neutral.

“Once again a group of bullying atheists impose their religion of no God on people,” he tweeted. ”They or their position are not neutral as they are not for Christ so they are against. People need to stand up to these anti-God religious zealots who get their way by bulling & falsely claiming they want a neutral situation.”

“They want everyone to conform to their atheist religion,” Ham wrote. ”They are very intolerant people. They walk in darkness not light, ‘Take no part in the unfruitful works of darkness, but instead expose them’ (Ephesians 5:11).”

Jesus made it clear that there is no neutral ground when He stated, “He that is not with me is against me” (Matthew 12:30).

Many countries, including the United States, that were once founded on Judeo-Christian values have grown increasingly secularized and hostile to the Biblical worldview, and religious freedom has been dwindled down as a result.

The Bible warns Christians that in the time prior to the return of Christ our corrupt society would hate and resist Biblical truth. The name of Christ and the Gospel of Salvation has always been a rock of offense to the world (1 Peter 2:7-8), however, in the last days, we are told in Scripture this opposition would be on a much grander scale.

2 Timothy 3:1,12-15 KJV – “This know also, that in the last days perilous times shall come… all that will live godly in Christ Jesus shall suffer persecution. But evil men and seducers shall wax worse and worse, deceiving, and being deceived. But continue thou in the things which thou hast learned and hast been assured of, knowing of whom thou hast learned them; And that from a child thou hast known the holy scriptures, which are able to make thee wise unto salvation through faith which is in Christ Jesus.”

A Michigan county board stopped holding prayers before legislative meetings last month, and a Christian conservative legal organization argued that the board caved under incomplete information from a secularist nonprofit, despite the Supreme Court’s repeated approvals of the longstanding practice.

The Leelanau County Board of Commissioners voted 5-2 in January to remove the prayer portion of their meeting and replace it with a moment of silence after the Freedom From Religion Foundation (FFRF), which advocates for atheists, agnostics, and promotes the separation of church and state, sent them a letter in September urging them to end the practice.

“And can I say ‘Amen’ to that?” FFRF Co-President Annie Laurie Gaylor said in a news release after the decision. “We commend the hard work of our local activists who fought for inclusivity and the wisdom of the Leelanau County Board for listening.”

In the letter, FFRF wrote that some residents were concerned and had reported that the board recently started opening its meetings with Christian prayer. About 30% of Leelanau County residents identify as religiously unaffiliated, according to FFRF.

The letter stated that the board’s policy limited those who could deliver an invocation to those who represent an organization with an established presence in the county. FFRF argued that those limits ensured the prayers would be Christian, instead of other religious or nonreligious beliefs of those in Leelanau County.

“We write to the request [sic] that the Board end its prayer practice, either by replacing it with a moment of silence, or by removing it completely, in order to respect the views of all Leelanau County resident,” the letter added.

In response, the First Liberty Institute, a law firm dedicated to defending and restoring religious liberty, wrote its own letter to the board dated Tuesday, over concerns that they ended the practice based on an “inexcusably incomplete information and legal analysis,” from FFRF.

While both letters cited the 2014 Supreme Court case Town of Greece v. Galloway – in which the Court ruled that legislative bodies, like city councils, could begin meetings with prayer even if it favors a specific religion – the FFRF letter failed to disclose that the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit – in which Leelanau County sits – concluded that legislative invocations are permitted under the U.S. Constitution, whether led by chaplains, local volunteers, or elected officials.

Jeremy Dys, special counsel for litigation and communications at First Liberty, was blunt when writing about the omission from FFRF.

“This is controlling precedent for Leelanau County. Thus, it is inexplicable and outrageous that any attorney purporting to analyze the law on this topic would intentionally omit or accidentally ignore reference to County of Jackson,” Dys wrote in the letter, referring to Bormuth v. County of Jackson (2017).

“It’s like leaving out in a recipe for sweet tea, it’s like leaving out that you’re supposed to put sugar in it,” Dys told Fox News via phone. “It’s that atrocious.”

In the case of Town of Greece v. Galloway, the Court decided that the town of Greece, New York, may permit volunteer chaplains to open each legislative session with a prayer. The court ruled, 5-4, that prayers before the meeting did not violate the constitution prohibition against government establishment of religion.

In its letter, FFRF argued that a critical factor in the Court’s decision in finding the practice in Galloway did not violate the Constitution was because Greece “represented that it would welcome a prayer by any minister or layman who wished to give one.”

“The Supreme Court’s decision would have been different had the town used the prayer opportunity to discriminate against minority religions,” FFRF argued.

Dys said the Sixth Circuit decision gave the approval to have elected officials themselves lead such prayers. 

FFRF Staff Attorney Chris Lane released a statement to Fox News which read in part: “The County of Jackson v. Bormuth Sixth Circuit case referenced by First Liberty is relevant only to legislator-led prayer. That factual scenario was not at play in Leelanau County, where the prayers were slated to be delivered by religious leaders, not legislators. The Bormuth case is irrelevant to the situation at hand. The Supreme Court has deemed prayer at legislative meetings constitutional, and FFRF’s letter did not claim otherwise.”

“The Board did the right thing by its citizens in voting to halt the proposed prayer practice and instead schedule a moment of silence, which excludes no one. For an organization claiming to defend religious liberty for all Americans, First Liberty should be pleased that the Board opted to respect everyone’s religion (or irreligion),” the statement added. 

The Supreme Court also upheld legislative prayer in a case out of Nebraska nearly forty years ago. 

In that case, Marsh v. Chambers (1983), the Court noted that the “opening of sessions of legislative and other deliberative public bodies with prayer is deeply embedded in the history and tradition of this country,” and “has coexisted with the principles of disestablishment and religious freedom” since our founding.

Marsh specifically dealt with the practice of the Nebraska legislature to pay a chaplain to deliver legislative invocations ahead of its unicameral meetings. By approving the practice in the case, the Court approved that legislative bodies like the board can employ a chaplain who would, among other things, open public meetings with prayer. 

The Sixth Circuit reviewed the decisions of Marsh and Greece.

“We are unaware of the motivations giving rise to your decision,” Dys added in the letter to the board. “However, if the Commission based its decision solely upon the letter sent by FFRF, it did so based upon woefully incomplete information. In light of the information articulated herein, that decision should be reconsidered.

“Lawyers are supposed to give complete advice to those seeking counsel, not push a political agenda.  FFRF inexcusably left out multiple, critical cases that unequivocally approve of legislative prayer and then twisted Town of Greece—a case that approves of religious leaders leading legislative prayer—in order to push this county commission into adopting the conclusion FFRF wanted. Now that Leelanau County has more complete information, they are free to make whatever decision they think best and their voters approve,” he told Fox News. 

HD Editor’s Note: Why Is This News Biblically Relevant?

Ken Ham in response to the Freedom From Religion Foundation’s bully campaign to remove prayer from the meeting, warned that those advocating for secularism are anything but neutral.

“Once again a group of bullying atheists impose their religion of no God on people,” he tweeted. ”They or their position are not neutral as they are not for Christ so they are against. People need to stand up to these anti-God religious zealots who get their way by bulling & falsely claiming they want a neutral situation.”

“They want everyone to conform to their atheist religion,” Ham wrote. ”They are very intolerant people. They walk in darkness not light, ‘Take no part in the unfruitful works of darkness, but instead expose them’ (Ephesians 5:11).”

Jesus made it clear that there is no neutral ground when He stated, “He that is not with me is against me” (Matthew 12:30).

Many countries, including the United States, that were once founded on Judeo-Christian values have grown increasingly secularized and hostile to the Biblical worldview, and religious freedom has been dwindled down as a result.

The Bible warns Christians that in the time prior to the return of Christ our corrupt society would hate and resist Biblical truth. The name of Christ and the Gospel of Salvation has always been a rock of offense to the world (1 Peter 2:7-8), however, in the last days, we are told in Scripture this opposition would be on a much grander scale.

2 Timothy 3:1,12-15 KJV – “This know also, that in the last days perilous times shall come… all that will live godly in Christ Jesus shall suffer persecution. But evil men and seducers shall wax worse and worse, deceiving, and being deceived. But continue thou in the things which thou hast learned and hast been assured of, knowing of whom thou hast learned them; And that from a child thou hast known the holy scriptures, which are able to make thee wise unto salvation through faith which is in Christ Jesus.”