give

June 11, 2026

June, 11, 2026
June 11, 2026

give

untitled artwork

untitled artwork

World news biblically understood

TRENDING:

Gov’t Driven Attacks On Parental Authority: Modern Policies Have Become Destructive To The Family

As the U.S. Air Force was dropping bombs on the mullahs in Iran this week, the U.S. Supreme Court released a ruling that put the cultural mullahs here at home on notice.

Parents and teachers in California sued the state over a policy requiring teachers to hide information from parents about their children’s efforts to socially transition their gender at school. Schools were required to keep parents in the dark unless the child gave permission to inform them. Remarkably, this policy applied even to elementary school students.

A federal district court ruled in favor of the parents and issued an injunction preventing schools from misleading parents about their children’s gender identity at school or their social transitioning efforts.

However, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals stepped in and stayed the injunction, allowing the state’s ideologically driven policy — one that effectively alienates parents from their children — to remain in effect.

The parents and teachers then appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court, arguing in part on religious liberty grounds that the injunction should remain in place until the case is resolved.

Enough of the justices agreed and granted emergency relief, allowing the injunction against the policy to take effect while the case proceeds. The court noted that the parents are likely to succeed on the merits and that allowing the policy to remain in effect would cause irreparable harm to their rights.

To be clear, this was not the final ruling on the merits of the case. But it is an important signal that the parents’ claims are substantial and they could ultimately prevail.

But this case also exposes something larger: how far government has drifted from its proper role — and how destructive some modern policies have become to the family.

It is remarkable that the state of California argued that this policy served a compelling interest in student safety and privacy. Yet, as the court noted, such policies effectively cut out the primary protectors of children’s best interests: their parents.

That observation brings us to the central issue. Who ultimately bears responsibility for the well-being and formation of children?

Citing a case from more than a century ago, the Supreme Court reaffirmed the long-standing precedent that parents — not the state — have the primary authority regarding the upbringing and education of their children.

The real question is how our society reached the point where states believe they have the authority to cut parents out of decisions that can permanently shape or, in some cases, end a child’s life.

On almost no other issue — except abortion — would such deliberate disregard for parental authority be tolerated. That tells us a lot.

At its core, this conflict reflects a deeper cultural departure from a biblical understanding of family and responsibility.

Scripture consistently places responsibility for a child’s instruction and formation on the parents. Proverbs 22:6 reminds us, “Train up a child in the way he should go, and when he is old he will not depart from it.”

Parents may delegate aspects of their child’s education, but they can never delegate responsibility. God holds mothers and fathers accountable for the guidance and protection of their children.

That is why parents must remain informed, engaged, and willing to hold schools accountable.

Because in the end, it won’t be the system that lives with the consequences of these decisions.

It will be the parents.


DONOR SUPPORTED: If you have been blessed by Harbinger’s Daily, prayerfully consider donating today.

Finally Cornered, SPLC President Hunkers Down Under Congressional Scrutiny

While the DOJ indictment of SPLC featured prominently in the hearing, the hearing went further. As FRC President Tony Perkins observed on “Washington Watch,” “Al Capone got charged with tax evasion, but everybody knew that wasn’t the extent of what he did.” In the same way, “this is a much broader conspiracy.” For the SPLC scrutiny has only begun. The DOJ indictment and a series of congressional hearings has only begun to scratch the surface of its shady dealings. The spotlight of public scrutiny will continue.

A Time To Act: Is Now The Moment For Netanyahu To Declare A New ‘Independence Day’ For Israel

President Trump says that Prime Minister Netanyahu will accept whatever deal his administration makes. Maybe, maybe not. Netanyahu could see the approaching November midterm elections in America and even Israeli elections in October, and declare that this is the moment for a new Israeli Independence Day. Netanyahu knows that there is a growing number of congressmembers who want to reduce Israel's dependence on the United States. Both the Prime Minister and Israel as a whole agree. In 1948, independence meant Israel would become a country—a new Independence Day means Israel gets to hit, and hit back hard, against any threat that thinks Israel shouldn't be one.

sign up

Jan Markell: Is Israel’s Spiritual Blindness A Reason For Christians To Reject Them?

Ezekiel 36 emphasizes that when the Jews return to the land, they will do so in unbelief. There will be spiritual regeneration much later! The dry bones of Ezekiel 37 reflect a lack of breath or spiritual life. God states he is gathering them back “not for your sake but for my holy name’s sake,” because their presence among the nations caused his name to be profaned. Ezekiel 36 promises that once back in the land, God will cleanse them, give them a new spirit, and cause them to walk in his statutes. But much later.

ABC's of Salvation

Decision

UTT

FOI

untitled artwork

Israel My Glory

As the U.S. Air Force was dropping bombs on the mullahs in Iran this week, the U.S. Supreme Court released a ruling that put the cultural mullahs here at home on notice.

Parents and teachers in California sued the state over a policy requiring teachers to hide information from parents about their children’s efforts to socially transition their gender at school. Schools were required to keep parents in the dark unless the child gave permission to inform them. Remarkably, this policy applied even to elementary school students.

A federal district court ruled in favor of the parents and issued an injunction preventing schools from misleading parents about their children’s gender identity at school or their social transitioning efforts.

However, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals stepped in and stayed the injunction, allowing the state’s ideologically driven policy — one that effectively alienates parents from their children — to remain in effect.

The parents and teachers then appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court, arguing in part on religious liberty grounds that the injunction should remain in place until the case is resolved.

Enough of the justices agreed and granted emergency relief, allowing the injunction against the policy to take effect while the case proceeds. The court noted that the parents are likely to succeed on the merits and that allowing the policy to remain in effect would cause irreparable harm to their rights.

To be clear, this was not the final ruling on the merits of the case. But it is an important signal that the parents’ claims are substantial and they could ultimately prevail.

But this case also exposes something larger: how far government has drifted from its proper role — and how destructive some modern policies have become to the family.

It is remarkable that the state of California argued that this policy served a compelling interest in student safety and privacy. Yet, as the court noted, such policies effectively cut out the primary protectors of children’s best interests: their parents.

That observation brings us to the central issue. Who ultimately bears responsibility for the well-being and formation of children?

Citing a case from more than a century ago, the Supreme Court reaffirmed the long-standing precedent that parents — not the state — have the primary authority regarding the upbringing and education of their children.

The real question is how our society reached the point where states believe they have the authority to cut parents out of decisions that can permanently shape or, in some cases, end a child’s life.

On almost no other issue — except abortion — would such deliberate disregard for parental authority be tolerated. That tells us a lot.

At its core, this conflict reflects a deeper cultural departure from a biblical understanding of family and responsibility.

Scripture consistently places responsibility for a child’s instruction and formation on the parents. Proverbs 22:6 reminds us, “Train up a child in the way he should go, and when he is old he will not depart from it.”

Parents may delegate aspects of their child’s education, but they can never delegate responsibility. God holds mothers and fathers accountable for the guidance and protection of their children.

That is why parents must remain informed, engaged, and willing to hold schools accountable.

Because in the end, it won’t be the system that lives with the consequences of these decisions.

It will be the parents.


Trusted Analysis From A Biblical Worldview

Help reach the lost and equip the church with the living and active truth of God's Word in our world today.

YOU CARE ABOUT

BIBLICAL TRUTH. SO DO WE.

 

Together, We Can Deliver A Biblical Understanding

Of News Events Around The World.

Finally Cornered, SPLC President Hunkers Down Under Congressional Scrutiny

While the DOJ indictment of SPLC featured prominently in the hearing, the hearing went further. As FRC President Tony Perkins observed on “Washington Watch,” “Al Capone got charged with tax evasion, but everybody knew that wasn’t the extent of what he did.” In the same way, “this is a much broader conspiracy.” For the SPLC scrutiny has only begun. The DOJ indictment and a series of congressional hearings has only begun to scratch the surface of its shady dealings. The spotlight of public scrutiny will continue.

A Time To Act: Is Now The Moment For Netanyahu To Declare A New ‘Independence Day’ For Israel

President Trump says that Prime Minister Netanyahu will accept whatever deal his administration makes. Maybe, maybe not. Netanyahu could see the approaching November midterm elections in America and even Israeli elections in October, and declare that this is the moment for a new Israeli Independence Day. Netanyahu knows that there is a growing number of congressmembers who want to reduce Israel's dependence on the United States. Both the Prime Minister and Israel as a whole agree. In 1948, independence meant Israel would become a country—a new Independence Day means Israel gets to hit, and hit back hard, against any threat that thinks Israel shouldn't be one.

untitled artwork 6391

Jan Markell: Is Israel’s Spiritual Blindness A Reason For Christians To Reject Them?

Ezekiel 36 emphasizes that when the Jews return to the land, they will do so in unbelief. There will be spiritual regeneration much later! The dry bones of Ezekiel 37 reflect a lack of breath or spiritual life. God states he is gathering them back “not for your sake but for my holy name’s sake,” because their presence among the nations caused his name to be profaned. Ezekiel 36 promises that once back in the land, God will cleanse them, give them a new spirit, and cause them to walk in his statutes. But much later.

ABC's of Salvation

TV AD

worldview matters

Decision Magazine V AD

Decision

Jan Markell

Israel My Glory

Erick Stakelbeck

untitled artwork

YOU CARE ABOUT

BIBLICAL TRUTH.

SO DO WE.

Together, We Can Deliver A Biblical Understanding Of News Events Around The World And Equip The Church To Stand With A Biblical Worldview.

untitled artwork

Israel My Glory

YOU CARE ABOUT

BIBLICAL TRUTH.

SO DO WE.

 

Together, We Can Deliver A Biblical Understanding Of News Events Around The World And Equip The Church To Stand With A Biblical Worldview.