November 2, 2026

November, 2, 2026
November 2, 2026

give

untitled artwork

untitled artwork

World news biblically understood

TRENDING:

Why Socialists Betrayed The Working Class

Allie Beth Stuckey interviewed me (and my fiancé, Annie) on her podcast, Relatable, yesterday morning. The interview will be released on Monday.

Near the end of the interview, Allie and I talked about why leftists and socialists are condemning the Freedom Convoy’s peaceful protests even after they defended the Black Lives Matter riots two years ago.

I said one of the reasons why leftists and socialists hate the Freedom Convoy is because the truckers want what leftists and socialists hate most: freedom. 

Leftists are happy to defend riots that demand more government control and they’re happy to denounce protests that advocate for freedom.

But there’s a more interesting reason why socialists hate the Freedom Convoy. 

One of the reasons why socialists hate the Freedom Convoy is because Marxists have replaced the working class with a new proletariate: anyone who isn’t white.

There are many black, brown, and Indigenous people in Ottawa and the entire country protesting the vaccine mandates. However, the Freedom Convoy is made up of mostly white, working class Canadians, especially truckers.

In today’s political climate, that makes them “problematic”.

The working class is the original proletariate for Marxists. Karl Marx and his disciples claimed the working class are oppressed by the upper class (or bourgeoisie) through capitalism. According to the original Marxists, the working class and the upper class would remain in a class struggle until the working class gained class consciousness for a revolution that would overthrow capitalism and the upper class, in order to create a communist utopia. 

After decades of failing to produce the utopia, socialists have betrayed their base—the working class—in an attempt to create a utopia with a different base.

In his book From Class to Race: Essays in White Marxism and Black Radicalism, one of the founders of critical race theory, Charles W. Mills said:

“the original white radical orthodoxy [from Marxism] was that: there is a primary conflict, and it’s class…My radical thesis [critical race theory] is that…there is a primary conflict, and it’s racism.”

In other words, the original Marxists believed the primary conflict in society is a class struggle between oppressive upper class people against oppressed working class people—like truckers. 

Through critical race theory, however, many marxists today believe the primary conflict in society is a race struggle between oppressed non-white people against oppressive white people—like white truckers.

It’s crucial to understand that. Critical race theory has changed leftist political strategy. Leftists no longer believe (white) working class people are the proletariate, they now believe (white) working class part of the bourgeoisie. 

According to leftists today, (white) working class people are not oppressed. They are oppressors.

But the truth is, working class people are not oppressors or oppressed. Race-centric marxism is just as wrong as class-centric Marxism. The original Marxists were just as wrong as the critical race theorists. 

Marxists claimed the free-market system is oppressive because they want government control, not freedom. In the same way, leftists today claim medical freedom is oppressive because they want government control, not freedom.

The original Marxists never cared about the working class. And the newer marxists do not care about non-white people either. They’re just willing to use “useful idiots” to gain power, then they’ll marginalize them like everybody else.

Just as they now believe the working class is useless for their political agenda—one day, they’ll believe black people are useless for their political agenda too. In fact, it’s already happening. Through the concept of intersectionality, transgender people are already being positioned as the new proletariate.

Leftists and socialist politicians do not care about people, they only care about power. Their opposition to the Freedom Convoy exposes that.

Far-Reaching Implications: With The Ultimate Results Of Israel’s Election Still Up In The Air, The Jewish State Needs Our Prayer

Partnership with anti-Zionist arab parties to gain a majority government should be out of the question—why would an Israeli government lock arms with individuals bent on the eradication of the Jewish State? That’s a question for the anti-Netanyahu bloc, which did just that in 2021 to gain power under Naftali Bennet and Yair Lapid. Much like the radical left in the United States, the anti-Netanyahu bloc—through compromise, biased media backing, and concessions on the global stage—has proven willing to endanger their own nation to achieve their objectives.

How Should Christians Stand When Standing Is No Longer Considered Polite Or Permitted?

In January, worshippers at Cities Church in Minnesota were shocked to see a mob of angry activists storming the sanctuary, shouting obscenities and terrifying young children as they protested. Across Europe, anti-Christian attacks have also been steadily rising—vandalism, desecration, physical violence, and arson. Britain has supplied its own version of opposition: men and women arrested for silently praying outside abortion clinics, Christian speech silenced online, and even a lawmaker, Finnish Parliament Member Päivi Räsänen, temporarily barred from flying through London Heathrow because of her Biblical convictions.

sign up

The Church Cannot Remain Silent On Biblical Matters Because They Have Been Declared ‘Political’

Jesus called His followers the salt of the earth and the light of the world. Neither image suggests withdrawal. Both describe engagement that makes a difference. So the issue is not whether the church should become political. It is whether Christians will remain biblical when biblical truth has political consequences. Our calling is neither to become the mouthpiece of a party nor to retreat into silence. It is to stand on God’s word, defend what is right, confront what is wrong, and speak with courage — even when the culture would rather we remain silent.

ABC's of Salvation

Decision

christ in prophecy

christ in prophecy

Decision

untitled artwork

Israel My Glory

Allie Beth Stuckey interviewed me (and my fiancé, Annie) on her podcast, Relatable, yesterday morning. The interview will be released on Monday.

Near the end of the interview, Allie and I talked about why leftists and socialists are condemning the Freedom Convoy’s peaceful protests even after they defended the Black Lives Matter riots two years ago.

I said one of the reasons why leftists and socialists hate the Freedom Convoy is because the truckers want what leftists and socialists hate most: freedom. 

Leftists are happy to defend riots that demand more government control and they’re happy to denounce protests that advocate for freedom.

But there’s a more interesting reason why socialists hate the Freedom Convoy. 

One of the reasons why socialists hate the Freedom Convoy is because Marxists have replaced the working class with a new proletariate: anyone who isn’t white.

There are many black, brown, and Indigenous people in Ottawa and the entire country protesting the vaccine mandates. However, the Freedom Convoy is made up of mostly white, working class Canadians, especially truckers.

In today’s political climate, that makes them “problematic”.

The working class is the original proletariate for Marxists. Karl Marx and his disciples claimed the working class are oppressed by the upper class (or bourgeoisie) through capitalism. According to the original Marxists, the working class and the upper class would remain in a class struggle until the working class gained class consciousness for a revolution that would overthrow capitalism and the upper class, in order to create a communist utopia. 

After decades of failing to produce the utopia, socialists have betrayed their base—the working class—in an attempt to create a utopia with a different base.

In his book From Class to Race: Essays in White Marxism and Black Radicalism, one of the founders of critical race theory, Charles W. Mills said:

“the original white radical orthodoxy [from Marxism] was that: there is a primary conflict, and it’s class…My radical thesis [critical race theory] is that…there is a primary conflict, and it’s racism.”

In other words, the original Marxists believed the primary conflict in society is a class struggle between oppressive upper class people against oppressed working class people—like truckers. 

Through critical race theory, however, many marxists today believe the primary conflict in society is a race struggle between oppressed non-white people against oppressive white people—like white truckers.

It’s crucial to understand that. Critical race theory has changed leftist political strategy. Leftists no longer believe (white) working class people are the proletariate, they now believe (white) working class part of the bourgeoisie. 

According to leftists today, (white) working class people are not oppressed. They are oppressors.

But the truth is, working class people are not oppressors or oppressed. Race-centric marxism is just as wrong as class-centric Marxism. The original Marxists were just as wrong as the critical race theorists. 

Marxists claimed the free-market system is oppressive because they want government control, not freedom. In the same way, leftists today claim medical freedom is oppressive because they want government control, not freedom.

The original Marxists never cared about the working class. And the newer marxists do not care about non-white people either. They’re just willing to use “useful idiots” to gain power, then they’ll marginalize them like everybody else.

Just as they now believe the working class is useless for their political agenda—one day, they’ll believe black people are useless for their political agenda too. In fact, it’s already happening. Through the concept of intersectionality, transgender people are already being positioned as the new proletariate.

Leftists and socialist politicians do not care about people, they only care about power. Their opposition to the Freedom Convoy exposes that.

Trusted Analysis From A Biblical Worldview

Help reach the lost and equip the church with the living and active truth of God's Word in our world today.

YOU CARE ABOUT

BIBLICAL TRUTH. SO DO WE.

 

Together, We Can Deliver A Biblical Understanding

Of News Events Around The World.

Far-Reaching Implications: With The Ultimate Results Of Israel’s Election Still Up In The Air, The Jewish State Needs Our Prayer

Partnership with anti-Zionist arab parties to gain a majority government should be out of the question—why would an Israeli government lock arms with individuals bent on the eradication of the Jewish State? That’s a question for the anti-Netanyahu bloc, which did just that in 2021 to gain power under Naftali Bennet and Yair Lapid. Much like the radical left in the United States, the anti-Netanyahu bloc—through compromise, biased media backing, and concessions on the global stage—has proven willing to endanger their own nation to achieve their objectives.

How Should Christians Stand When Standing Is No Longer Considered Polite Or Permitted?

In January, worshippers at Cities Church in Minnesota were shocked to see a mob of angry activists storming the sanctuary, shouting obscenities and terrifying young children as they protested. Across Europe, anti-Christian attacks have also been steadily rising—vandalism, desecration, physical violence, and arson. Britain has supplied its own version of opposition: men and women arrested for silently praying outside abortion clinics, Christian speech silenced online, and even a lawmaker, Finnish Parliament Member Päivi Räsänen, temporarily barred from flying through London Heathrow because of her Biblical convictions.

untitled artwork 6391

The Church Cannot Remain Silent On Biblical Matters Because They Have Been Declared ‘Political’

Jesus called His followers the salt of the earth and the light of the world. Neither image suggests withdrawal. Both describe engagement that makes a difference. So the issue is not whether the church should become political. It is whether Christians will remain biblical when biblical truth has political consequences. Our calling is neither to become the mouthpiece of a party nor to retreat into silence. It is to stand on God’s word, defend what is right, confront what is wrong, and speak with courage — even when the culture would rather we remain silent.

ABC's of Salvation

TV AD

worldview matters

Decision Magazine V AD

Decision

Jan Markell

Israel My Glory

Erick Stakelbeck

untitled artwork

YOU CARE ABOUT

BIBLICAL TRUTH.

SO DO WE.

Together, We Can Deliver A Biblical Understanding Of News Events Around The World And Equip The Church To Stand With A Biblical Worldview.

untitled artwork

Israel My Glory

YOU CARE ABOUT

BIBLICAL TRUTH.

SO DO WE.

 

Together, We Can Deliver A Biblical Understanding Of News Events Around The World And Equip The Church To Stand With A Biblical Worldview.