November 4, 2026

November, 4, 2026
November 4, 2026

give

untitled artwork

untitled artwork

World news biblically understood

TRENDING:

Cruz: Dems Have Decided It’s in Their Political Interest to Allow Mobs to Carry Out Violence

During Wednesday’s broadcast of Fox News Channel’s “Fox News @ Night,” Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) argued Democrats politicians in some of America’s cities and states were allowing protests to get out of control because they saw it as “in their political best interest to allow the mob to carry out their violence.”

He explained that he was offering legislation that would allow for increased damages if citizens were denied police protection, and that resulted in injuries to person or property.

“You know, this is a really tough time for our country right now,” he said. “We’re seeing riots across the country. We’re seeing violence and police cars being firebombed, police officers being murdered, and violent mobs within our cities. But even worse, in the face of that, we’re also seeing Democratic politicians — Democratic mayors, Democratic governors — who have somehow made the decision it’s in their political best interest to allow the mob to carry out their violence. And they’re refusing to protect their own citizens. They’re allowing these lawless autonomous zones to exist within their boundaries. That has never happened in modern times.”

“And so, I introduced this week legislation that if an elected official wrongfully denies their citizens the right to police protection in the situation of a riot, that you can sue them and get triple damages for any injuries you suffer or for any damage to your home or your business,” Cruz continued. “And a lot of these Democratic politicians sat by as small businesses were looted and burned to the ground. Many of those small business owners were African-American or Hispanics. But the Democratic politicians didn’t care. It was in their — what they defined as their partisan interest to allow the mob to rage. That’s — that’s not right.”

Cruz said the federal government was justified to react when federal property was threatened. He offered examples in American history of federal intervention in instances of civil unrest.

“You know, this shouldn’t be complicated,” Cruz said. “These are pretty simple rules in life. Don’t physically hurt somebody else. Don’t assault somebody else. Don’t burn their business to the ground. Don’t murder somebody else. But yet, the violent mobs aren’t following that. And, in this instance — so what’s happened is these mobs are attacking federal buildings. They’re attacking federal courthouses. Now, it ought to be real simple. If you attack a federal courthouse, the answer ought to be — you’re going to be arrested. You’re going to be put in jail. You’re going to stay in jail a long time. It’s real simple, don’t attack a federal courthouse.

“Well, what the federal government is quite reasonably doing is sending federal law enforcement agencies to protect federal buildings, protect federal courthouses, and I’ve never seen anything like it,” he continued. “Actually — you know what, I said never seen anything like it. Yes — yes, I have. What these Democrats are doing is the same thing we saw Democrats do in the 1950s and ’60s. It’s the same thing Democratic politicians like Bull Connor did. It’s the same thing that you saw Democratic racists who didn’t want to segregate schools — and remember Eisenhower sent in the Army and said, you’re going to follow, you’re going to follow Brown versus Board of Education, and you had elected Democrats, and they were all Democrats who were enforcing Jim Crow who said get your federal officers out of here.”

“Well, guess what?” Cruz added. “You don’t have the ability to throw the federal government out. You don’t have the ability to throw federal law enforcement officers out. And you certainly don’t have the ability to say, ‘We’re going to allow the federal courthouse or the federal building to burn.’ You know what? If the Chicago mayor wants to allow the mob to rampage in city hall and occupy her office, that’s — that’s her decision. Knock yourself out if you want to give in to the lawlessness. But she doesn’t have the right to give up the federal courthouse, and neither does the mayor of Portland or the governor of Oregon, or any of these Democrats who they’ve made a decision the police are the enemy and the mob are their allies, and it’s just — it’s wrong.”

Mob Violence
CLICK HERE FOR
SOURCE

Billy Graham: Voting Is A ‘God-Given Responsibility,’ And A Means To ‘Drive Back The Forces Of Evil’   

In the United States, Christians have the right to vote. “Millions [of people around] the world,” Billy Graham once reminded us, “do not know the meaning of this freedom.” At the voting booth, believers can support leaders who are committed to serving the public and standing for the unchanging truths found in God’s Word. Yet this freedom often goes unused. While turnout changes from one election to the next, research suggested that more than 40 percent of Christians did not vote in the last election. Throughout his life, Billy Graham encouraged believers to make their voices heard in politics. “The Bible plainly teaches that we are to participate in good citizenship and that we are to respect men in authority,” he said, “and we are to pray for those who govern us.” The evangelist considered voting a “God-given responsibility,” a means to “drive back the forces of evil.”

Why Christians Have A Biblical Responsibility To Participate In The Political Process

With the 2026 midterm elections just days away, millions of Americans are preparing to cast their ballots in an election that will have significant implications for the nation’s future. With control of Congress hanging in the balance, voters will help determine the legislative agenda and political trajectory of the next two years. For Christians, the election raises questions that go beyond political parties, candidates, and policy preferences. Is voting merely a civic privilege, or does Scripture provide a theological framework for understanding it as an act of stewardship and love of neighbor? And what role should pastors and churches play in equipping believers to exercise this responsibility faithfully? As Americans prepare to head to the polls next Tuesday, these questions invite us to consider a more fundamental issue: whether Christians have a Biblical responsibility to participate in the political process.

sign up

The Church Cannot Remain Silent On Biblical Matters Because They Have Been Declared ‘Political’

Jesus called His followers the salt of the earth and the light of the world. Neither image suggests withdrawal. Both describe engagement that makes a difference. So the issue is not whether the church should become political. It is whether Christians will remain biblical when biblical truth has political consequences. Our calling is neither to become the mouthpiece of a party nor to retreat into silence. It is to stand on God’s word, defend what is right, confront what is wrong, and speak with courage — even when the culture would rather we remain silent.

ABC's of Salvation

Decision

christ in prophecy

christ in prophecy

Decision

untitled artwork

Israel My Glory

During Wednesday’s broadcast of Fox News Channel’s “Fox News @ Night,” Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) argued Democrats politicians in some of America’s cities and states were allowing protests to get out of control because they saw it as “in their political best interest to allow the mob to carry out their violence.”

He explained that he was offering legislation that would allow for increased damages if citizens were denied police protection, and that resulted in injuries to person or property.

“You know, this is a really tough time for our country right now,” he said. “We’re seeing riots across the country. We’re seeing violence and police cars being firebombed, police officers being murdered, and violent mobs within our cities. But even worse, in the face of that, we’re also seeing Democratic politicians — Democratic mayors, Democratic governors — who have somehow made the decision it’s in their political best interest to allow the mob to carry out their violence. And they’re refusing to protect their own citizens. They’re allowing these lawless autonomous zones to exist within their boundaries. That has never happened in modern times.”

“And so, I introduced this week legislation that if an elected official wrongfully denies their citizens the right to police protection in the situation of a riot, that you can sue them and get triple damages for any injuries you suffer or for any damage to your home or your business,” Cruz continued. “And a lot of these Democratic politicians sat by as small businesses were looted and burned to the ground. Many of those small business owners were African-American or Hispanics. But the Democratic politicians didn’t care. It was in their — what they defined as their partisan interest to allow the mob to rage. That’s — that’s not right.”

Cruz said the federal government was justified to react when federal property was threatened. He offered examples in American history of federal intervention in instances of civil unrest.

“You know, this shouldn’t be complicated,” Cruz said. “These are pretty simple rules in life. Don’t physically hurt somebody else. Don’t assault somebody else. Don’t burn their business to the ground. Don’t murder somebody else. But yet, the violent mobs aren’t following that. And, in this instance — so what’s happened is these mobs are attacking federal buildings. They’re attacking federal courthouses. Now, it ought to be real simple. If you attack a federal courthouse, the answer ought to be — you’re going to be arrested. You’re going to be put in jail. You’re going to stay in jail a long time. It’s real simple, don’t attack a federal courthouse.

“Well, what the federal government is quite reasonably doing is sending federal law enforcement agencies to protect federal buildings, protect federal courthouses, and I’ve never seen anything like it,” he continued. “Actually — you know what, I said never seen anything like it. Yes — yes, I have. What these Democrats are doing is the same thing we saw Democrats do in the 1950s and ’60s. It’s the same thing Democratic politicians like Bull Connor did. It’s the same thing that you saw Democratic racists who didn’t want to segregate schools — and remember Eisenhower sent in the Army and said, you’re going to follow, you’re going to follow Brown versus Board of Education, and you had elected Democrats, and they were all Democrats who were enforcing Jim Crow who said get your federal officers out of here.”

“Well, guess what?” Cruz added. “You don’t have the ability to throw the federal government out. You don’t have the ability to throw federal law enforcement officers out. And you certainly don’t have the ability to say, ‘We’re going to allow the federal courthouse or the federal building to burn.’ You know what? If the Chicago mayor wants to allow the mob to rampage in city hall and occupy her office, that’s — that’s her decision. Knock yourself out if you want to give in to the lawlessness. But she doesn’t have the right to give up the federal courthouse, and neither does the mayor of Portland or the governor of Oregon, or any of these Democrats who they’ve made a decision the police are the enemy and the mob are their allies, and it’s just — it’s wrong.”

Mob Violence
CLICK HERE FOR
SOURCE

Trusted Analysis From A Biblical Worldview

Help reach the lost and equip the church with the living and active truth of God's Word in our world today.

YOU CARE ABOUT

BIBLICAL TRUTH. SO DO WE.

 

Together, We Can Deliver A Biblical Understanding

Of News Events Around The World.

Billy Graham: Voting Is A ‘God-Given Responsibility,’ And A Means To ‘Drive Back The Forces Of Evil’   

In the United States, Christians have the right to vote. “Millions [of people around] the world,” Billy Graham once reminded us, “do not know the meaning of this freedom.” At the voting booth, believers can support leaders who are committed to serving the public and standing for the unchanging truths found in God’s Word. Yet this freedom often goes unused. While turnout changes from one election to the next, research suggested that more than 40 percent of Christians did not vote in the last election. Throughout his life, Billy Graham encouraged believers to make their voices heard in politics. “The Bible plainly teaches that we are to participate in good citizenship and that we are to respect men in authority,” he said, “and we are to pray for those who govern us.” The evangelist considered voting a “God-given responsibility,” a means to “drive back the forces of evil.”

Why Christians Have A Biblical Responsibility To Participate In The Political Process

With the 2026 midterm elections just days away, millions of Americans are preparing to cast their ballots in an election that will have significant implications for the nation’s future. With control of Congress hanging in the balance, voters will help determine the legislative agenda and political trajectory of the next two years. For Christians, the election raises questions that go beyond political parties, candidates, and policy preferences. Is voting merely a civic privilege, or does Scripture provide a theological framework for understanding it as an act of stewardship and love of neighbor? And what role should pastors and churches play in equipping believers to exercise this responsibility faithfully? As Americans prepare to head to the polls next Tuesday, these questions invite us to consider a more fundamental issue: whether Christians have a Biblical responsibility to participate in the political process.

untitled artwork 6391

The Church Cannot Remain Silent On Biblical Matters Because They Have Been Declared ‘Political’

Jesus called His followers the salt of the earth and the light of the world. Neither image suggests withdrawal. Both describe engagement that makes a difference. So the issue is not whether the church should become political. It is whether Christians will remain biblical when biblical truth has political consequences. Our calling is neither to become the mouthpiece of a party nor to retreat into silence. It is to stand on God’s word, defend what is right, confront what is wrong, and speak with courage — even when the culture would rather we remain silent.

ABC's of Salvation

TV AD

worldview matters

Decision Magazine V AD

Decision

Jan Markell

Israel My Glory

Erick Stakelbeck

untitled artwork

YOU CARE ABOUT

BIBLICAL TRUTH.

SO DO WE.

Together, We Can Deliver A Biblical Understanding Of News Events Around The World And Equip The Church To Stand With A Biblical Worldview.

untitled artwork

Israel My Glory

YOU CARE ABOUT

BIBLICAL TRUTH.

SO DO WE.

 

Together, We Can Deliver A Biblical Understanding Of News Events Around The World And Equip The Church To Stand With A Biblical Worldview.