June 26, 2026

June, 26, 2026
June 26, 2026

give

untitled artwork

untitled artwork

World news biblically understood

TRENDING:

Thomas Jefferson’s ‘Separation Of Church And State’ Never Meant Keeping God Out Of Government

Leading up to the Fourth of July, the White House hosted “Rededicate 250: A National Jubilee of Prayer, Praise & Thanksgiving.” Since that May event, some Americans have been complaining that it was a violation of the so-called “separation between Church and State.”

Much of their argument revolves around the claim that the phrase appears in the U.S. Constitution. But it doesn’t. The first mention of a “wall of separation” is in a letter Thomas Jefferson wrote in reply to the Danbury Baptist Association in Connecticut.

While the Danbury Baptists had freedom of religion, they were discriminated against by the state for not being a part of the Congregationalist Church. This was the established church of Connecticut, funded by taxpayer money.

They wrote to Jefferson, thanking him for his stand on religious liberty and bringing to his attention the lack of freedom they were experiencing: “What religious privileges we enjoy (as a minor part of the State) we enjoy as favors granted, not as inalienable rights: and these favors we receive at the expense of such degrading acknowledgments, are inconsistent with the rights of freemen.

They were concerned the federal government might establish a national church or whether they would have true freedom of religion. Jefferson wrote back his famous reply: “I contemplate with sovereign reverence that act of the whole American people which declared that their legislature should ‘make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof,’ thus building a wall of separation between Church & State.”

In context, it’s clear this wall of separation was not created to keep religion out of the State. It was simply intended to protect religious freedom and to place boundaries on the State’s control over the Church.

Garth Kant, in his article “God and Government,” summed this up well: “Jefferson opposed a ‘national’ religion. He did not oppose a religious nation. Or a religious government. He opposed a government religion. The difference is critical.”

In fact, the United States Capitol served as a church building for seven decades and Jefferson himself was a regular attendee. He attended so faithfully that he earned a reserved seat. On the Sunday after he wrote the letter to the Danbury Baptists, he attended church services at the still-under-construction Capitol.

This is a perfect example of how Jefferson’s “wall of separation” was never meant to keep religion completely out of government. Instead, faith has a home in America – even in the Capitol.

Another example would be the Constitutional Convention, the gathering to lay a more solid foundation for the new government. After several weeks of tension and fierce debate, Benjamin Franklin suggested they pray: “All of us who were engaged in the struggle must have observed frequent instances of a Superintending providence in our favor… do we imagine that we no longer need His assistance… I therefore beg leave to move — that henceforth prayers imploring the assistance of Heaven, and its blessings on our deliberations, be held…”

During this brief recess for religious gatherings, Rev. William Rogers led a prayer for the Convention, asking the Lord for wisdom and unity. Edmund Randolph of Virginia also suggested that a public sermon be delivered to the delegates. After, it was evident there was a tangible shift in the room. Disagreements were resolved, and the Constitution was finalized.

Jefferson never meant to wall off the Church from public life. Instead, faith is an important part of American history and tradition. Calling for Americans to cry out to a Higher Power aligns with the thoughts and actions of the Founding Fathers. Their actions were shaped by their faith, and 250 years of history stand as a testament to it.


give

The ‘Promises’ Of Marriage Redefinition Have Played Out, And The American People Are Rendering Their Own Verdict

As we mark the 11th anniversary of Obergefell, Americans are no longer arguing over predictions; they are judging outcomes. They have watched the promises of marriage redefinition play out in their schools, businesses, athletic competitions, churches, and families. Increasingly, the American people are rendering their own verdict. The great experiment of redefining marriage and reinventing the family has produced its results. Americans are no longer judging promises — they are judging outcomes. The debate over the Sexual Revolution is no longer about its promises. It is about its consequences.

Major Implications: The Unholy Alliance Of Islamists And Socialists Is Careening Toward The Halls Of Congress

America's largest city, our financial capital, is in deep trouble—and what is happening in New York City right now could have major implications for every American. What we are seeing is an unholy alliance of Islamists and socialists rising to political power. These anti-American radicals are no longer just fringe rabble-rousers and street agitators—they are now heading to the halls of Congress.

sign up

Jan Markell: You Can’t Have A Genuine Revival With False Doctrine Raging

I hear a dozen evangelists stating that we are on the verge of a great revival. One self-proclaimed prophet says that a billion souls will come to faith in the coming weeks and months. If my Rapture is imminent, how can there be an imminent revival? Which is it? The Bible does talk about a coming revival. The question concerns its timing. Is it in the coming days, or is it after the Rapture when the “left behind” world realizes they should have listened to believers like you and me, get a second chance, and multitudes come to faith?

ABC's of Salvation

Decision

UTT

FOI

untitled artwork

Israel My Glory

Leading up to the Fourth of July, the White House hosted “Rededicate 250: A National Jubilee of Prayer, Praise & Thanksgiving.” Since that May event, some Americans have been complaining that it was a violation of the so-called “separation between Church and State.”

Much of their argument revolves around the claim that the phrase appears in the U.S. Constitution. But it doesn’t. The first mention of a “wall of separation” is in a letter Thomas Jefferson wrote in reply to the Danbury Baptist Association in Connecticut.

While the Danbury Baptists had freedom of religion, they were discriminated against by the state for not being a part of the Congregationalist Church. This was the established church of Connecticut, funded by taxpayer money.

They wrote to Jefferson, thanking him for his stand on religious liberty and bringing to his attention the lack of freedom they were experiencing: “What religious privileges we enjoy (as a minor part of the State) we enjoy as favors granted, not as inalienable rights: and these favors we receive at the expense of such degrading acknowledgments, are inconsistent with the rights of freemen.

They were concerned the federal government might establish a national church or whether they would have true freedom of religion. Jefferson wrote back his famous reply: “I contemplate with sovereign reverence that act of the whole American people which declared that their legislature should ‘make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof,’ thus building a wall of separation between Church & State.”

In context, it’s clear this wall of separation was not created to keep religion out of the State. It was simply intended to protect religious freedom and to place boundaries on the State’s control over the Church.

Garth Kant, in his article “God and Government,” summed this up well: “Jefferson opposed a ‘national’ religion. He did not oppose a religious nation. Or a religious government. He opposed a government religion. The difference is critical.”

In fact, the United States Capitol served as a church building for seven decades and Jefferson himself was a regular attendee. He attended so faithfully that he earned a reserved seat. On the Sunday after he wrote the letter to the Danbury Baptists, he attended church services at the still-under-construction Capitol.

This is a perfect example of how Jefferson’s “wall of separation” was never meant to keep religion completely out of government. Instead, faith has a home in America – even in the Capitol.

Another example would be the Constitutional Convention, the gathering to lay a more solid foundation for the new government. After several weeks of tension and fierce debate, Benjamin Franklin suggested they pray: “All of us who were engaged in the struggle must have observed frequent instances of a Superintending providence in our favor… do we imagine that we no longer need His assistance… I therefore beg leave to move — that henceforth prayers imploring the assistance of Heaven, and its blessings on our deliberations, be held…”

During this brief recess for religious gatherings, Rev. William Rogers led a prayer for the Convention, asking the Lord for wisdom and unity. Edmund Randolph of Virginia also suggested that a public sermon be delivered to the delegates. After, it was evident there was a tangible shift in the room. Disagreements were resolved, and the Constitution was finalized.

Jefferson never meant to wall off the Church from public life. Instead, faith is an important part of American history and tradition. Calling for Americans to cry out to a Higher Power aligns with the thoughts and actions of the Founding Fathers. Their actions were shaped by their faith, and 250 years of history stand as a testament to it.


Trusted Analysis From A Biblical Worldview

Help reach the lost and equip the church with the living and active truth of God's Word in our world today.

YOU CARE ABOUT

BIBLICAL TRUTH. SO DO WE.

 

Together, We Can Deliver A Biblical Understanding

Of News Events Around The World.

The ‘Promises’ Of Marriage Redefinition Have Played Out, And The American People Are Rendering Their Own Verdict

As we mark the 11th anniversary of Obergefell, Americans are no longer arguing over predictions; they are judging outcomes. They have watched the promises of marriage redefinition play out in their schools, businesses, athletic competitions, churches, and families. Increasingly, the American people are rendering their own verdict. The great experiment of redefining marriage and reinventing the family has produced its results. Americans are no longer judging promises — they are judging outcomes. The debate over the Sexual Revolution is no longer about its promises. It is about its consequences.

Major Implications: The Unholy Alliance Of Islamists And Socialists Is Careening Toward The Halls Of Congress

America's largest city, our financial capital, is in deep trouble—and what is happening in New York City right now could have major implications for every American. What we are seeing is an unholy alliance of Islamists and socialists rising to political power. These anti-American radicals are no longer just fringe rabble-rousers and street agitators—they are now heading to the halls of Congress.

untitled artwork 6391

Jan Markell: You Can’t Have A Genuine Revival With False Doctrine Raging

I hear a dozen evangelists stating that we are on the verge of a great revival. One self-proclaimed prophet says that a billion souls will come to faith in the coming weeks and months. If my Rapture is imminent, how can there be an imminent revival? Which is it? The Bible does talk about a coming revival. The question concerns its timing. Is it in the coming days, or is it after the Rapture when the “left behind” world realizes they should have listened to believers like you and me, get a second chance, and multitudes come to faith?

ABC's of Salvation

TV AD

worldview matters

Decision Magazine V AD

Decision

Jan Markell

Israel My Glory

Erick Stakelbeck

untitled artwork

YOU CARE ABOUT

BIBLICAL TRUTH.

SO DO WE.

Together, We Can Deliver A Biblical Understanding Of News Events Around The World And Equip The Church To Stand With A Biblical Worldview.

untitled artwork

Israel My Glory

YOU CARE ABOUT

BIBLICAL TRUTH.

SO DO WE.

 

Together, We Can Deliver A Biblical Understanding Of News Events Around The World And Equip The Church To Stand With A Biblical Worldview.