January 30, 2026

January, 30, 2026
January 30, 2026

give

untitled artwork

untitled artwork

World news biblically understood

TRENDING:

Forcing Americans To Fund Abortion: This Is Not Merely A Policy Dispute; It Is A Profound Moral Wrong

Tony Perkins

Picture this: you’re sitting in a nice restaurant. The people at the next table spare no expense, ordering the most expensive items on the menu. That’s their choice. But when the waiter brings you the bill and says, “You didn’t order any of this — but you’re paying for it anyway,” you’d rightly be outraged.

As offensive as that would be, it pales in comparison to the injustice of forcing taxpayers to fund the killing of the unborn. This is not merely a policy dispute; it is a profound moral wrong. It compounds one injustice upon another — first, the taking of innocent human life, and then compelling citizens to finance an act that violates the moral law of the author of life.

That is precisely why the late Congressman Henry Hyde successfully crafted what became known as the Hyde Amendment in 1976. Hyde, an annual appropriations rider adopted every year since, established the only enduring common ground on abortion policy: Americans should not be forced to fund an act many believe is morally abhorrent — the taking of an unborn child’s life.

Despite decades of pro-abortion propaganda and cultural indoctrination, a clear majority of Americans — 57% — still oppose being compelled to fund abortions. Among Republican voters, that opposition rises to 83%. In today’s fractured political climate, few issues command that level of agreement, even within a single party.

That is what makes President Trump’s call this week for Republicans to be “a little flexible on Hyde” during negotiations over Obamacare subsidies so stunning. Retreating from the party’s long-standing defense of the unborn is not pragmatism; it is the shortest path to becoming a permanent minority.

At issue is the Affordable Care Act itself, which was deceptively designed to evade Hyde’s protections when it was passed in 2010 without Republican support. The COVID-era subsidies, again pushed solely by Democrats during the Biden administration, funneled even more money into an already failing system under the pretext of emergency relief. What is now unmistakably clear is that the so-called Affordable Care Act is, in fact, unaffordable.

Some Republicans have signaled a willingness to support a short-term extension while Congress works to overhaul the system, but only if Hyde protections are included. Democrats have flatly rejected that condition, insisting that abortion coverage remain mandatory. That position has been, and must remain, a red line for Republicans.

When we consider the moral truth of the sanctity of human life in the womb — and the equally important right of citizens not to be forced to finance its destruction — we are reminded of the words of another president at a moment of national consequence who said: “Important principles may, and must, be inflexible.”

Those were among the last public words spoken by Abraham Lincoln, and those words still speak today.


Your support helps Harbinger's Daily propel the boldest and most sound Christian voices of our day—those unwavering in their defense of the truth and passionate about reaching the unsaved world—while engaging millions to stand courageously with a worldview grounded in God's Word. 

Will you defend the truth and equip others to do the same?

Are Jewish Patients Safe In Australian Hospitals?

Have you ever been in a hospital as a patient? I am sure that most of you have. When being admitted, you are required to provide important details such as your name and your chosen faith. But what if you were taken to a hospital in a democratic Western country and the hospital administrators decided to give you a different name and redact details of your faith without your consent? Would you be upset? If the answer is no, then picture this: what if you were Jewish and the hospital changed your name and redacted your Jewish identity without your consent? Now, you might be thinking that would never happen in a Western nation in the modern day. Well, it just did. In Australia.

Minnesota Is Not An Outlier; It Is A Case Study Of What Happens When Institutions Abondon Moral Restraints

Minnesota is not an outlier; it is a case study of what happens when institutions that once fostered moral restraint abandon that role. The real cause is less obvious because it is far removed from the tragic events we see today in the headlines. It can be traced back decades to what was called the long march through the institutions — a phrase coined in the late 1960s by Marxist student leader Rudi Dutschke. The phrase deliberately echoed Mao Zedong’s Long March, but Dutschke’s was not a military campaign. It was a cultural and ideological one, measured in decades rather than battles.

sign up

In An Ever Darkening World, We Can Find Solace In Bible Prophecy

The bright side of the growing evil in the world is that it is a sure sign that we are living in the season of the Lord’s return. If you will check Genesis 6, you will find that Noah’s society was characterized by violence and immorality. This is the reason that the great pastor, Adrian Rogers (1931-2005), once said, “The world is growing gloriously dark.” How can the acceleration of evil be considered “glorious”? Because it is a sign of the imminent return of Jesus.

ABC's of Salvation

Decision

UTT

untitled artwork

Israel My Glory

Tony Perkins

Picture this: you’re sitting in a nice restaurant. The people at the next table spare no expense, ordering the most expensive items on the menu. That’s their choice. But when the waiter brings you the bill and says, “You didn’t order any of this — but you’re paying for it anyway,” you’d rightly be outraged.

As offensive as that would be, it pales in comparison to the injustice of forcing taxpayers to fund the killing of the unborn. This is not merely a policy dispute; it is a profound moral wrong. It compounds one injustice upon another — first, the taking of innocent human life, and then compelling citizens to finance an act that violates the moral law of the author of life.

That is precisely why the late Congressman Henry Hyde successfully crafted what became known as the Hyde Amendment in 1976. Hyde, an annual appropriations rider adopted every year since, established the only enduring common ground on abortion policy: Americans should not be forced to fund an act many believe is morally abhorrent — the taking of an unborn child’s life.

Despite decades of pro-abortion propaganda and cultural indoctrination, a clear majority of Americans — 57% — still oppose being compelled to fund abortions. Among Republican voters, that opposition rises to 83%. In today’s fractured political climate, few issues command that level of agreement, even within a single party.

That is what makes President Trump’s call this week for Republicans to be “a little flexible on Hyde” during negotiations over Obamacare subsidies so stunning. Retreating from the party’s long-standing defense of the unborn is not pragmatism; it is the shortest path to becoming a permanent minority.

At issue is the Affordable Care Act itself, which was deceptively designed to evade Hyde’s protections when it was passed in 2010 without Republican support. The COVID-era subsidies, again pushed solely by Democrats during the Biden administration, funneled even more money into an already failing system under the pretext of emergency relief. What is now unmistakably clear is that the so-called Affordable Care Act is, in fact, unaffordable.

Some Republicans have signaled a willingness to support a short-term extension while Congress works to overhaul the system, but only if Hyde protections are included. Democrats have flatly rejected that condition, insisting that abortion coverage remain mandatory. That position has been, and must remain, a red line for Republicans.

When we consider the moral truth of the sanctity of human life in the womb — and the equally important right of citizens not to be forced to finance its destruction — we are reminded of the words of another president at a moment of national consequence who said: “Important principles may, and must, be inflexible.”

Those were among the last public words spoken by Abraham Lincoln, and those words still speak today.


Trusted Analysis From A Biblical Worldview

Help reach the lost and equip the church with the living and active truth of God's Word in our world today.

YOU CARE ABOUT

BIBLICAL TRUTH. SO DO WE.

 

Together, We Can Deliver A Biblical Understanding

Of News Events Around The World.

Are Jewish Patients Safe In Australian Hospitals?

Have you ever been in a hospital as a patient? I am sure that most of you have. When being admitted, you are required to provide important details such as your name and your chosen faith. But what if you were taken to a hospital in a democratic Western country and the hospital administrators decided to give you a different name and redact details of your faith without your consent? Would you be upset? If the answer is no, then picture this: what if you were Jewish and the hospital changed your name and redacted your Jewish identity without your consent? Now, you might be thinking that would never happen in a Western nation in the modern day. Well, it just did. In Australia.

Minnesota Is Not An Outlier; It Is A Case Study Of What Happens When Institutions Abondon Moral Restraints

Minnesota is not an outlier; it is a case study of what happens when institutions that once fostered moral restraint abandon that role. The real cause is less obvious because it is far removed from the tragic events we see today in the headlines. It can be traced back decades to what was called the long march through the institutions — a phrase coined in the late 1960s by Marxist student leader Rudi Dutschke. The phrase deliberately echoed Mao Zedong’s Long March, but Dutschke’s was not a military campaign. It was a cultural and ideological one, measured in decades rather than battles.

untitled artwork 6391

In An Ever Darkening World, We Can Find Solace In Bible Prophecy

The bright side of the growing evil in the world is that it is a sure sign that we are living in the season of the Lord’s return. If you will check Genesis 6, you will find that Noah’s society was characterized by violence and immorality. This is the reason that the great pastor, Adrian Rogers (1931-2005), once said, “The world is growing gloriously dark.” How can the acceleration of evil be considered “glorious”? Because it is a sign of the imminent return of Jesus.

ABC's of Salvation

TV AD

worldview matters

Decision Magazine V AD

Decision

Jan Markell

Israel My Glory

Erick Stakelbeck

untitled artwork

YOU CARE ABOUT

BIBLICAL TRUTH.

SO DO WE.

Together, We Can Deliver A Biblical Understanding Of News Events Around The World And Equip The Church To Stand With A Biblical Worldview.

Israel My Glory

untitled artwork

YOU CARE ABOUT

BIBLICAL TRUTH.

SO DO WE.

 

Together, We Can Deliver A Biblical Understanding Of News Events Around The World And Equip The Church To Stand With A Biblical Worldview.