giv

A federal judge has ruled against Cambridge Christian School (CCS), a private Christian high school in Tampa, Florida, stating that the Florida High School Athletic Association (FHSAA) had the right to bar the school from delivering a pregame prayer over the loudspeaker before a 2015 state championship football game.

U.S. District Judge Charlene Edwards Honeywell reasoned that because the game was hosted by the FHSAA at a government-owned stadium, the prayer would have been considered “government speech,” which does not fall under the First Amendment’s Free Exercise Clause.

“The Court concludes that the First Amendment does not apply because the speech at issue is government speech, but even if some portion of the speech is considered private speech, the Court finds no constitutional violation occurred,” Honeywell wrote in her 38-page ruling.

But Hiram Sasser, executive general counsel for religious liberty organization First Liberty Institute, told The Christian Post that the real issue is whether the school was forbidden from praying over the loudspeaker because the action was “religious.” 

“The athletic association, like so many people, uses that PA system for … messages of their own choosing, or they read off messages, advertising messages, and everything else,” Sasser said. “So there is so much private use of that PA system. To not allow the schools to use it for their opening prayer they always had just doesn’t make any sense.”

Honeywell said that “the Court’s role is not to ‘drill too far down into “belief” and “sincerity”’ to determine whether communal pregame prayer is a sincerely-held belief of CCS,” but then asserted that “communal pregame prayer over the PA system is a preference of CCS’, not a deeply rooted tradition that rises to the level of a sincerely held belief.”

Jesse Panuccio, another lawyer representing Cambridge Christian, argued in a December hearing that the FHSAA displayed “viewpoint discrimination and arbitrariness” in its decision to block the prayer, pointing out that the association allowed a pregame prayer over the loudspeaker at a 2012 state championship at the same stadium.

“There are two data points, two times that schools requested to pray at the class 2A championship game. And in 50% of them, the FHSAA approved the request. That is arbitrary application,” Panuccio said.

This is not the first time Honeywell sided with the FHSAA. In 2017, she dismissed the case, but in 2019, the 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals overturned the dismissal and sent the case back to Honeywell for further consideration.

Following Honeywell’s most recent decision, Sasser indicated that First Liberty plans to appeal a second time on behalf of Cambridge Christian.

Watch LIVE Election Night Coverage Tuesday, November 3 at 8 pm ET | 5 pm PT

Election Night Coverage From A Biblical Worldview 

SIGN UP FREE FOR REAL LIFE NETWORK 

Stream Real Life Network directly from your TV. Available on all major smart TVs, mobile devices, and streaming platforms.

Stream Real Life Network directly from your TV. Available on all major smart TVs, mobile devices, and streaming platforms.

SIGN UP FREE FOR REAL LIFE NETWORK 

Stream Real Life Network directly from your TV. Available on all major smart TVs, mobile devices, and streaming platforms.

Stream Real Life Network directly from your TV. Available on all major smart TVs, mobile devices, and streaming platforms.

November 4, 2026

Watch LIVE Election Night Coverage Tuesday, November 3 at 8 pm ET | 5 pm PT

Election Night Coverage From A Biblical Worldview 

Stream Real Life Network for free directly on your TV. Available on all major smart TVs, mobile devices, and streaming platforms.

Stream Real Life Network directly from your TV. Available on all major smart TVs, mobile devices, and streaming platforms.

November, 4, 2026

untitled artwork

untitled artwork

World news biblically understood

TRENDING:

Federal Judge Rules Against Florida Christian School in Pregame Prayer Lawsuit

A federal judge has ruled against Cambridge Christian School (CCS), a private Christian high school in Tampa, Florida, stating that the Florida High School Athletic Association (FHSAA) had the right to bar the school from delivering a pregame prayer over the loudspeaker before a 2015 state championship football game.

U.S. District Judge Charlene Edwards Honeywell reasoned that because the game was hosted by the FHSAA at a government-owned stadium, the prayer would have been considered “government speech,” which does not fall under the First Amendment’s Free Exercise Clause.

“The Court concludes that the First Amendment does not apply because the speech at issue is government speech, but even if some portion of the speech is considered private speech, the Court finds no constitutional violation occurred,” Honeywell wrote in her 38-page ruling.

But Hiram Sasser, executive general counsel for religious liberty organization First Liberty Institute, told The Christian Post that the real issue is whether the school was forbidden from praying over the loudspeaker because the action was “religious.” 

“The athletic association, like so many people, uses that PA system for … messages of their own choosing, or they read off messages, advertising messages, and everything else,” Sasser said. “So there is so much private use of that PA system. To not allow the schools to use it for their opening prayer they always had just doesn’t make any sense.”

Honeywell said that “the Court’s role is not to ‘drill too far down into “belief” and “sincerity”’ to determine whether communal pregame prayer is a sincerely-held belief of CCS,” but then asserted that “communal pregame prayer over the PA system is a preference of CCS’, not a deeply rooted tradition that rises to the level of a sincerely held belief.”

Jesse Panuccio, another lawyer representing Cambridge Christian, argued in a December hearing that the FHSAA displayed “viewpoint discrimination and arbitrariness” in its decision to block the prayer, pointing out that the association allowed a pregame prayer over the loudspeaker at a 2012 state championship at the same stadium.

“There are two data points, two times that schools requested to pray at the class 2A championship game. And in 50% of them, the FHSAA approved the request. That is arbitrary application,” Panuccio said.

This is not the first time Honeywell sided with the FHSAA. In 2017, she dismissed the case, but in 2019, the 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals overturned the dismissal and sent the case back to Honeywell for further consideration.

Following Honeywell’s most recent decision, Sasser indicated that First Liberty plans to appeal a second time on behalf of Cambridge Christian.

Billy Graham: Voting Is A ‘God-Given Responsibility,’ And A Means To ‘Drive Back The Forces Of Evil’   

In the United States, Christians have the right to vote. “Millions [of people around] the world,” Billy Graham once reminded us, “do not know the meaning of this freedom.” At the voting booth, believers can support leaders who are committed to serving the public and standing for the unchanging truths found in God’s Word. Yet this freedom often goes unused. While turnout changes from one election to the next, research suggested that more than 40 percent of Christians did not vote in the last election. Throughout his life, Billy Graham encouraged believers to make their voices heard in politics. “The Bible plainly teaches that we are to participate in good citizenship and that we are to respect men in authority,” he said, “and we are to pray for those who govern us.” The evangelist considered voting a “God-given responsibility,” a means to “drive back the forces of evil.”

Why Christians Have A Biblical Responsibility To Participate In The Political Process

With the 2026 midterm elections just days away, millions of Americans are preparing to cast their ballots in an election that will have significant implications for the nation’s future. With control of Congress hanging in the balance, voters will help determine the legislative agenda and political trajectory of the next two years. For Christians, the election raises questions that go beyond political parties, candidates, and policy preferences. Is voting merely a civic privilege, or does Scripture provide a theological framework for understanding it as an act of stewardship and love of neighbor? And what role should pastors and churches play in equipping believers to exercise this responsibility faithfully? As Americans prepare to head to the polls next Tuesday, these questions invite us to consider a more fundamental issue: whether Christians have a Biblical responsibility to participate in the political process.

sign up

The Church Cannot Remain Silent On Biblical Matters Because They Have Been Declared ‘Political’

Jesus called His followers the salt of the earth and the light of the world. Neither image suggests withdrawal. Both describe engagement that makes a difference. So the issue is not whether the church should become political. It is whether Christians will remain biblical when biblical truth has political consequences. Our calling is neither to become the mouthpiece of a party nor to retreat into silence. It is to stand on God’s word, defend what is right, confront what is wrong, and speak with courage — even when the culture would rather we remain silent.

ABC's of Salvation

Decision

christ in prophecy

christ in prophecy

Decision

untitled artwork

Israel My Glory

A federal judge has ruled against Cambridge Christian School (CCS), a private Christian high school in Tampa, Florida, stating that the Florida High School Athletic Association (FHSAA) had the right to bar the school from delivering a pregame prayer over the loudspeaker before a 2015 state championship football game.

U.S. District Judge Charlene Edwards Honeywell reasoned that because the game was hosted by the FHSAA at a government-owned stadium, the prayer would have been considered “government speech,” which does not fall under the First Amendment’s Free Exercise Clause.

“The Court concludes that the First Amendment does not apply because the speech at issue is government speech, but even if some portion of the speech is considered private speech, the Court finds no constitutional violation occurred,” Honeywell wrote in her 38-page ruling.

But Hiram Sasser, executive general counsel for religious liberty organization First Liberty Institute, told The Christian Post that the real issue is whether the school was forbidden from praying over the loudspeaker because the action was “religious.” 

“The athletic association, like so many people, uses that PA system for … messages of their own choosing, or they read off messages, advertising messages, and everything else,” Sasser said. “So there is so much private use of that PA system. To not allow the schools to use it for their opening prayer they always had just doesn’t make any sense.”

Honeywell said that “the Court’s role is not to ‘drill too far down into “belief” and “sincerity”’ to determine whether communal pregame prayer is a sincerely-held belief of CCS,” but then asserted that “communal pregame prayer over the PA system is a preference of CCS’, not a deeply rooted tradition that rises to the level of a sincerely held belief.”

Jesse Panuccio, another lawyer representing Cambridge Christian, argued in a December hearing that the FHSAA displayed “viewpoint discrimination and arbitrariness” in its decision to block the prayer, pointing out that the association allowed a pregame prayer over the loudspeaker at a 2012 state championship at the same stadium.

“There are two data points, two times that schools requested to pray at the class 2A championship game. And in 50% of them, the FHSAA approved the request. That is arbitrary application,” Panuccio said.

This is not the first time Honeywell sided with the FHSAA. In 2017, she dismissed the case, but in 2019, the 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals overturned the dismissal and sent the case back to Honeywell for further consideration.

Following Honeywell’s most recent decision, Sasser indicated that First Liberty plans to appeal a second time on behalf of Cambridge Christian.

Trusted Analysis From A Biblical Worldview

Help reach the lost and equip the church with the living and active truth of God's Word in our world today.

YOU CARE ABOUT

BIBLICAL TRUTH. SO DO WE.

 

Together, We Can Deliver A Biblical Understanding

Of News Events Around The World.

Billy Graham: Voting Is A ‘God-Given Responsibility,’ And A Means To ‘Drive Back The Forces Of Evil’   

In the United States, Christians have the right to vote. “Millions [of people around] the world,” Billy Graham once reminded us, “do not know the meaning of this freedom.” At the voting booth, believers can support leaders who are committed to serving the public and standing for the unchanging truths found in God’s Word. Yet this freedom often goes unused. While turnout changes from one election to the next, research suggested that more than 40 percent of Christians did not vote in the last election. Throughout his life, Billy Graham encouraged believers to make their voices heard in politics. “The Bible plainly teaches that we are to participate in good citizenship and that we are to respect men in authority,” he said, “and we are to pray for those who govern us.” The evangelist considered voting a “God-given responsibility,” a means to “drive back the forces of evil.”

Why Christians Have A Biblical Responsibility To Participate In The Political Process

With the 2026 midterm elections just days away, millions of Americans are preparing to cast their ballots in an election that will have significant implications for the nation’s future. With control of Congress hanging in the balance, voters will help determine the legislative agenda and political trajectory of the next two years. For Christians, the election raises questions that go beyond political parties, candidates, and policy preferences. Is voting merely a civic privilege, or does Scripture provide a theological framework for understanding it as an act of stewardship and love of neighbor? And what role should pastors and churches play in equipping believers to exercise this responsibility faithfully? As Americans prepare to head to the polls next Tuesday, these questions invite us to consider a more fundamental issue: whether Christians have a Biblical responsibility to participate in the political process.

untitled artwork 6391

The Church Cannot Remain Silent On Biblical Matters Because They Have Been Declared ‘Political’

Jesus called His followers the salt of the earth and the light of the world. Neither image suggests withdrawal. Both describe engagement that makes a difference. So the issue is not whether the church should become political. It is whether Christians will remain biblical when biblical truth has political consequences. Our calling is neither to become the mouthpiece of a party nor to retreat into silence. It is to stand on God’s word, defend what is right, confront what is wrong, and speak with courage — even when the culture would rather we remain silent.

ABC's of Salvation

TV AD

worldview matters

Decision Magazine V AD

Decision

Jan Markell

Israel My Glory

Erick Stakelbeck

untitled artwork

YOU CARE ABOUT

BIBLICAL TRUTH.

SO DO WE.

Together, We Can Deliver A Biblical Understanding Of News Events Around The World And Equip The Church To Stand With A Biblical Worldview.

untitled artwork

Israel My Glory

YOU CARE ABOUT

BIBLICAL TRUTH.

SO DO WE.

 

Together, We Can Deliver A Biblical Understanding Of News Events Around The World And Equip The Church To Stand With A Biblical Worldview.