November 3, 2026

November, 3, 2026
November 3, 2026

give

untitled artwork

untitled artwork

World news biblically understood

TRENDING:

America Must Return To The Same Source Of The Founders’ Courage And Confidence: The Word Of God

Tony Perkins

As we celebrate 250 years of American independence, history would inform us that the true revolution did not begin with muskets, but with a profound change in belief driven by the Bible.

When we think of American Independence, we rightly think of those intrepid individuals who put their names to the Declaration. Men who said “for the support of this Declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes and our sacred Honor.” It is oft said that these men had essentially signed their own death warrants. The signers certainly sacrificed and suffered for their stand, so it is fitting that we honor them.

Yet when no less a towering figure than John Adams, a signer and our second president, commented on the origins of the American Revolution, his answer would surprise most modern Americans. Writing to Hezekiah Niles, who planned to pen a volume on the Revolution, Adams asserted that the War for Independence was not the actual Revolution. Instead, Adams argued that the “real American Revolution” had already occurred before a single shot was fired.

Adams wrote: “The Revolution was in the Minds and Hearts of the People. A Change in their Religious Sentiments of their Duties and Obligations.” He pointed to their exchange of loyalties because of the actions of Parliament. He mentions specifically how the British government exacted taxation without representation, plotted to install the Church of England as the state, tax-supported church in all the colonies, and became an abusive parent, “willing, like Lady Macbeth, to ‘dash their Brains out.’” Consequently, “it is no Wonder if their fillial Affections ceased.” Adams explained: “This produced, in 1760 and 1761, An Awakening and a Revival of American Principles and Feelings, with an Enthusiasm which went on increasing till in 1775 it burst out in open Violence, Hostility and Fury.”

Who took the lead in sounding the alarm and shaping public opinion in Massachusetts? Adams enumerated seven patriots, two of whom were Congregational pastors in Boston: Dr. Jonathan Mayhew of West Church and Dr. Samuel Cooper of Brattle Street Church. In fact, Adams particularly pointed to Dr. Mayhew’s influential printed sermon, Concerning Unlimited Submission and Non-Resistance to Higher Powers. Mayhew’s nearly 50-page exposition on Romans 13:1-8 explained what the Bible has to say about government, good and bad, and how we are to respond to either sort. Adams told Niles that Mayhew’s message “was read by every Body, celebrated by Friends, and abused by Enemies.”

While Mayhew was held up as an example, he was not alone. Indeed, the influence of the patriot pastors before and during the War for Independence cannot be overstated. The reason? The basic form of regular public communication for many of the colonists was a Bible-based sermon. “The New England Sermon,” writes Yale professor and historian Harry S. Stout, “had a topical range and social influence … so powerful in shaping cultural values, meanings and a sense of corporate purpose that even television pales by comparison.” Stout continues, “The average weekly churchgoer in New England (and there were far more churchgoers than church members) listened to something like 7,000 sermons in a lifetime, totaling somewhere around 15,000 hours of concentrated listening.”

When the British crown cracked down on Boston in 1774, including the blockade of their harbor, patriot pastors took to their pulpits, painting the conflict with Britain in Biblical terms, often portraying King George III as Pharaoh and the American colonies as the Israelites. The British called these pastors the “Black Robed Regiment” because they wore black clerical robes and passionately preached Biblical sermons against British tyranny. Adams wrote to his wife, Abigail, from Philadelphia: “The Clergy here of every denomination … thunder and lighten every Sabbath” against the “Oppression” of King George and the Parliament. These black-robed ministers were such a menace to the British that Brigadier Gen. Hugh Percy declared: “No body of men are so extremely injurious to peace and tranquility as the clergy. They preach sedition openly from their pulpits.”

Through their preaching, these patriot pastors helped bring about what Adams described as a “change in the religious sentiments” of the people. When war came, that same Biblical conviction fueled the courage to stand against tyranny. From their pulpits, these pastors not only made the case for independence; they also strengthened the people’s resolve to secure it.

If we are to preserve our liberty 250 years later, we need that same kind of real Revolution again. We must return to the same source of the founders’ courage and confidence: the Word of God.


Why Christians Have A Biblical Responsibility To Participate In The Political Process

With the 2026 midterm elections just days away, millions of Americans are preparing to cast their ballots in an election that will have significant implications for the nation’s future. With control of Congress hanging in the balance, voters will help determine the legislative agenda and political trajectory of the next two years. For Christians, the election raises questions that go beyond political parties, candidates, and policy preferences. Is voting merely a civic privilege, or does Scripture provide a theological framework for understanding it as an act of stewardship and love of neighbor? And what role should pastors and churches play in equipping believers to exercise this responsibility faithfully? As Americans prepare to head to the polls next Tuesday, these questions invite us to consider a more fundamental issue: whether Christians have a Biblical responsibility to participate in the political process.

A Barbaric Death Penalty: Politicians, Doctors, The Abortion Industry, And The Media Have Lied To Mothers

Sadly, the abortion industry continues to either deny the level of pain inflicted upon the preborn or bury the evidence by introducing “expert” reports that contain deliberately vague language which seeks to assure mothers that abortion does not cross any moral barriers. Although a consensus on the impact of pain on the preborn would be a positive step in educating the public, the reality is that pain tolerance does not excuse the injustice perpetrated in abortion clinics.

sign up

The Church Cannot Remain Silent On Biblical Matters Because They Have Been Declared ‘Political’

Jesus called His followers the salt of the earth and the light of the world. Neither image suggests withdrawal. Both describe engagement that makes a difference. So the issue is not whether the church should become political. It is whether Christians will remain biblical when biblical truth has political consequences. Our calling is neither to become the mouthpiece of a party nor to retreat into silence. It is to stand on God’s word, defend what is right, confront what is wrong, and speak with courage — even when the culture would rather we remain silent.

ABC's of Salvation

Decision

christ in prophecy

christ in prophecy

Decision

untitled artwork

Israel My Glory

Tony Perkins

As we celebrate 250 years of American independence, history would inform us that the true revolution did not begin with muskets, but with a profound change in belief driven by the Bible.

When we think of American Independence, we rightly think of those intrepid individuals who put their names to the Declaration. Men who said “for the support of this Declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes and our sacred Honor.” It is oft said that these men had essentially signed their own death warrants. The signers certainly sacrificed and suffered for their stand, so it is fitting that we honor them.

Yet when no less a towering figure than John Adams, a signer and our second president, commented on the origins of the American Revolution, his answer would surprise most modern Americans. Writing to Hezekiah Niles, who planned to pen a volume on the Revolution, Adams asserted that the War for Independence was not the actual Revolution. Instead, Adams argued that the “real American Revolution” had already occurred before a single shot was fired.

Adams wrote: “The Revolution was in the Minds and Hearts of the People. A Change in their Religious Sentiments of their Duties and Obligations.” He pointed to their exchange of loyalties because of the actions of Parliament. He mentions specifically how the British government exacted taxation without representation, plotted to install the Church of England as the state, tax-supported church in all the colonies, and became an abusive parent, “willing, like Lady Macbeth, to ‘dash their Brains out.’” Consequently, “it is no Wonder if their fillial Affections ceased.” Adams explained: “This produced, in 1760 and 1761, An Awakening and a Revival of American Principles and Feelings, with an Enthusiasm which went on increasing till in 1775 it burst out in open Violence, Hostility and Fury.”

Who took the lead in sounding the alarm and shaping public opinion in Massachusetts? Adams enumerated seven patriots, two of whom were Congregational pastors in Boston: Dr. Jonathan Mayhew of West Church and Dr. Samuel Cooper of Brattle Street Church. In fact, Adams particularly pointed to Dr. Mayhew’s influential printed sermon, Concerning Unlimited Submission and Non-Resistance to Higher Powers. Mayhew’s nearly 50-page exposition on Romans 13:1-8 explained what the Bible has to say about government, good and bad, and how we are to respond to either sort. Adams told Niles that Mayhew’s message “was read by every Body, celebrated by Friends, and abused by Enemies.”

While Mayhew was held up as an example, he was not alone. Indeed, the influence of the patriot pastors before and during the War for Independence cannot be overstated. The reason? The basic form of regular public communication for many of the colonists was a Bible-based sermon. “The New England Sermon,” writes Yale professor and historian Harry S. Stout, “had a topical range and social influence … so powerful in shaping cultural values, meanings and a sense of corporate purpose that even television pales by comparison.” Stout continues, “The average weekly churchgoer in New England (and there were far more churchgoers than church members) listened to something like 7,000 sermons in a lifetime, totaling somewhere around 15,000 hours of concentrated listening.”

When the British crown cracked down on Boston in 1774, including the blockade of their harbor, patriot pastors took to their pulpits, painting the conflict with Britain in Biblical terms, often portraying King George III as Pharaoh and the American colonies as the Israelites. The British called these pastors the “Black Robed Regiment” because they wore black clerical robes and passionately preached Biblical sermons against British tyranny. Adams wrote to his wife, Abigail, from Philadelphia: “The Clergy here of every denomination … thunder and lighten every Sabbath” against the “Oppression” of King George and the Parliament. These black-robed ministers were such a menace to the British that Brigadier Gen. Hugh Percy declared: “No body of men are so extremely injurious to peace and tranquility as the clergy. They preach sedition openly from their pulpits.”

Through their preaching, these patriot pastors helped bring about what Adams described as a “change in the religious sentiments” of the people. When war came, that same Biblical conviction fueled the courage to stand against tyranny. From their pulpits, these pastors not only made the case for independence; they also strengthened the people’s resolve to secure it.

If we are to preserve our liberty 250 years later, we need that same kind of real Revolution again. We must return to the same source of the founders’ courage and confidence: the Word of God.


Trusted Analysis From A Biblical Worldview

Help reach the lost and equip the church with the living and active truth of God's Word in our world today.

YOU CARE ABOUT

BIBLICAL TRUTH. SO DO WE.

 

Together, We Can Deliver A Biblical Understanding

Of News Events Around The World.

Why Christians Have A Biblical Responsibility To Participate In The Political Process

With the 2026 midterm elections just days away, millions of Americans are preparing to cast their ballots in an election that will have significant implications for the nation’s future. With control of Congress hanging in the balance, voters will help determine the legislative agenda and political trajectory of the next two years. For Christians, the election raises questions that go beyond political parties, candidates, and policy preferences. Is voting merely a civic privilege, or does Scripture provide a theological framework for understanding it as an act of stewardship and love of neighbor? And what role should pastors and churches play in equipping believers to exercise this responsibility faithfully? As Americans prepare to head to the polls next Tuesday, these questions invite us to consider a more fundamental issue: whether Christians have a Biblical responsibility to participate in the political process.

A Barbaric Death Penalty: Politicians, Doctors, The Abortion Industry, And The Media Have Lied To Mothers

Sadly, the abortion industry continues to either deny the level of pain inflicted upon the preborn or bury the evidence by introducing “expert” reports that contain deliberately vague language which seeks to assure mothers that abortion does not cross any moral barriers. Although a consensus on the impact of pain on the preborn would be a positive step in educating the public, the reality is that pain tolerance does not excuse the injustice perpetrated in abortion clinics.

untitled artwork 6391

The Church Cannot Remain Silent On Biblical Matters Because They Have Been Declared ‘Political’

Jesus called His followers the salt of the earth and the light of the world. Neither image suggests withdrawal. Both describe engagement that makes a difference. So the issue is not whether the church should become political. It is whether Christians will remain biblical when biblical truth has political consequences. Our calling is neither to become the mouthpiece of a party nor to retreat into silence. It is to stand on God’s word, defend what is right, confront what is wrong, and speak with courage — even when the culture would rather we remain silent.

ABC's of Salvation

TV AD

worldview matters

Decision Magazine V AD

Decision

Jan Markell

Israel My Glory

Erick Stakelbeck

untitled artwork

YOU CARE ABOUT

BIBLICAL TRUTH.

SO DO WE.

Together, We Can Deliver A Biblical Understanding Of News Events Around The World And Equip The Church To Stand With A Biblical Worldview.

untitled artwork

Israel My Glory

YOU CARE ABOUT

BIBLICAL TRUTH.

SO DO WE.

 

Together, We Can Deliver A Biblical Understanding Of News Events Around The World And Equip The Church To Stand With A Biblical Worldview.