(Queensland, Australia) — After more than two-and-a-half years of Covid lies, lockdowns and mandates most people are tired of hearing – or reading about – the latest Omicron variants, but in order to remind ourselves that all is not what it seems and that the information being given may not be either accurate or truthful, we need to continue seeking the truth on these matters.

The recent Australian Medical Professionals’ Society (AMPS) medico-legal summit hosted a panel of eminent experts that included professors, associate professors, consultant specialists, others with PhDs, and a lawyer. They discussed the public health and safety issues presently resulting from interpretations of the Health Regulation National Law and how proposed new amendments are likely to further impact on their ability to provide evidence-based best practice, informed consent and the sacred doctor-patient relationship.

Health professionals are being persecuted for their loyalty and belief in codes of conduct based on the Hippocratic Oath, the Declaration of Geneva and the International Code of Ethics. They have made commitments to serving the community, their patients, and to do no harm. The immediate action clauses and proposed new amendments, rather than protecting public health, safety and confidence pose a threat to public health. Instead of their patients being their primary concern, adherence to public health messaging will be the new accepted professional standard of ‘best practice’.

Gene-based vaccines are not normal vaccines. They are experimental, novel, under-tested and produce high rates of injuries. They use a completely new technology which has been previously used only in very severe life-threatening illnesses where there was a perceived potential benefit-risk response. Nothing is known about their long-term effects, hence Covid-19 experimental mRNA vaccines constitute the largest biological experiment in human history. Until we have long-term safety data, no one can claim they are safe. All mortality data from official UK, EU and US databases indicate a positive correlation with Covid-19 gene-based vaccine roll-outs during 2021 and increased life insurance payouts. Israel – the most vaccinated country in the world – has record numbers of cardiac health issues in their younger population and US military forces have a tenfold increase in registered diagnosis episodes following mRNA vaccinations. German pathologists have described pathological aggregates of spike proteins and lymphocyte infiltrations in inflamed organs in autopsies related to deaths post-vaccination.

Pfizer’s short-term phase-three clinical trials are now under a cloud of fraud and mismanagement allegations. Their vaccines are not as safe or as effective as we were told. They do not stop you from catching or spreading Covid, and research shows that the triple-vaccinated are more likely to get Covid compared to the unvaccinated. Furthermore, the more you vaccinate the greater the risk of desensitising and weakening the immune system. The risk/benefit ratios vary tremendously with age and do not justify the wide-scale use of these ‘vaccines’, especially in the Omicron variants where the infection fatality rate is approximately one-third that of seasonal ‘flu, and when natural immunity (blindingly ignored by the CDC and our various governments) is far more protective than Covid mRNA ‘vaccinations’.

Being vaccinated is not the only way out of the pandemic. There were safe alternatives and inexpensive proven early treatments that were freely available, yet they were suppressed and demonised by Big Pharma in order that Big Pharma may reap big profits. Governments used behaviour modification and ‘nudge’ public-relation strategies to increase compliance. The Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency (AHPRA) intimidated health professionals with de-registration if they diverted from the narrative. All scientific information at odds with the narrative was censored and risk/benefit debate was closed down. Businesses became proxies to roll out the vaccines by coercive industrial relations sanctions, strict rules were set for what could and could not be said in mainstream media and freedom of speech was lost.

The sacred doctor-patient relationship has been destroyed by government intrusion and mandated vaccinations. Most of all, children have great immune systems and the vast majority already have Sars Cov 2 antibodies. Data from the UK’s Office Of National Statistics (27/6/2022) shows that 82 percent of primary school children have Sars Cov 2 antibodies, all but 0.4 percent from natural immunity. In 2-year-old children, 99.7 percent have Sars Cov 2 antibodies (with 34.4 percent unvaccinated and 64.9 percent vaccinated) the majority of which have natural immunity too. This alone calls for an urgent review of the vaccination policy – a policy introduced in an emergency – especially now that there is proven negligible benefit in this age group because of the changing risk analysis. How can anyone justify experimental mRNA injections without any robust safety data or clinical benefits for an infection with a 99.95 percent recovery rate in their age bracket? This is a massive failure of duty of care! The benefits simply do not outweigh the risks, as verified by the more rational health agencies in Europe.

Much has been learned during the period of this “pandemic” and many industries have suffered a loss of public trust including political institutions, the medical industry, the pharmaceutical industry, and the police force. Whether trust can be rebuilt remains to be seen. But if anybody is to try, it must begin with transparency – something which all of the aforementioned agencies currently lack.

God is Sovereign – the State is not.

(Dean Dwyer – Queensland, Australia) — Although Christianity has faced many threats over time, the current and perhaps most surprising threat in democratic nations is statism.

When we speak about Christian freedom, at its core it is the freedom to worship and serve God without interference by authorities. After all, godly men and women are generally peaceful and therefore are able to self-govern according to their own convictions through the leading of the Holy Spirit and the ways declared in God’s Word. But, to the extent that the state limits the liberty of people governed by God’s law, it is an obstacle to serving God and furthering the Kingdom of God.

The early church went through a succession of persecutions because it did not represent a religion which was legally permissible (such as is currently happening in China). Such a legal status would have been available to the church, but they refused it. All the early Christians had to do was proclaim that “Caesar is Lord”. Yet, to the believer, it was unthinkable that they (or us) would declare allegiance to an earthly ruler over and above our Lord Jesus Christ.

Although society no longer enforces such an oath as “Caesar is Lord”, the pressure being brought to bear on believers to submit to the State is growing. After all, if God is sovereign, the State is not. If God’s law is supreme, none by man can be. And this is often what enrages atheistic politicians.

What has become a ridiculous turn of events is that the State should be fighting against evil, but it has now positioned itself against the good works and fruit of Christian service. Throughout the so-called “national emergency” of the coronavirus pandemic, centralisation of power and the increasing role of the State in removal of individual liberties is becoming a real concern to Christian leaders.

Friedrich Hayek (who fled Hitler’s maniacal conquest in Austria) wrote a book in 1944 titled: The Road to Serfdom. In it, he describes the tragic path to national poverty as a result of the unchecked State. His premise has been historically and undeniably proven: the abdication of one’s liberty to the State in exchange for supposed security is a regrettable reoccurrence in the story of human history. In reality, it is a bad deal for the individual. The State and the elite who run it are rewarded at the expense of an imprisoned population. Whenever the State tries to create man in its own image, it must destroy the man whom God created in His own image.

David Forte, a law professor, asked his students, “Do you have rights?” They all answer, “Yes, of course we do.” “Well, where do you get your rights?” To that question, he is greeted with silence. “If you receive your rights from God,” he explains, “then you have them by faith. If you receive your rights because of your humanity, then you are a follower of natural law. If you receive your rights from the State, then you have no rights at all.”

The problem which has been revealed throughout this “pandemic” is that people look in different places for solutions to their problems. Where should we be looking? Psalm 121:1-2 says, “I lift up my eyes to the hills – from where will my help come? My help comes from the Lord, who made heaven and earth.” He made me also and my allegiance is to Him alone, not a fallible State leader.