June 21, 2026

June, 21, 2026
June 21, 2026

give

untitled artwork

untitled artwork

World news biblically understood

TRENDING:

Dangerous National Trend: University Of Oregon To Dispense Abortion Pills Directly To Students

Reports surfaced last week that the University of Oregon will begin offering the abortion pill to students directly from its on-campus health center in the fall of 2026. The college became the latest in a succession of universities that have recently begun offering the drug on campus, which experts say poses extreme physical and mental health dangers to women and increases the chances of them being coerced into aborting their babies.

As reported by Live Action on Monday, the University of Oregon’s University Health Services (UHS) has decided to begin supplying the chemical abortion regimen of mifepristone and misoprostol to students on campus after an extended pressure campaign conducted by a coalition of leftist student organizations, including the Young Democratic Socialists of America. During an interview, UHS Director Margaret Trout admitted that the university initially did not want to offer the abortion pill because UHS was not able to carry out surgical abortions if the chemical abortion failed.

But eventually, the student organizations’ pressure campaign worked, and UHS changed its mind. Associated Students of the University of Oregon (ASUO) President Prissila Moreno, who led the campaign, called the decision a “huge win for student power.” The cost of the abortion pill will be fully covered for students who have health insurance in the state due to Oregon’s Reproductive Health Equity Act, which mandates all state health insurance providers to cover 100% of abortion costs.

As observed by Live Action’s Carole Novielli, “Already facing financial and educational pressures as well as potential pressure from parents or the baby’s father, having the abortion 100% paid for adds an additional push to have an abortion that the student may not want.”

The University of Oregon joins a rapidly expanding list of colleges across the country that are now supplying the abortion drug to students on campus. California became the first state to pioneer the practice, passing a measure that took effect in January 2023 that requires all 33 public universities in the state to dispense abortion pills. Other universities that supply chemical abortion to students include the University of Illinois Chicago, the University of Massachusetts Amherst, and Portland State University.

The development comes amid a legal battle currently raging between pro-life states and the Trump administration over its decision not to enforce a federal law that prohibits the distribution of abortion pills through the mail and its reluctance to reverse Biden-era moves that stripped away safeguards that regulated the drug’s dispensation.

Pro-life advocates like Global Life Campaign Founder Thomas Jacobson say that there are a multitude of serious consequences that will occur as a result of the federal government allowing the abortion drug to spread.

[T]here’s enormous efforts to unleash the abortion pill upon our nation without thinking, without really dealing with the consequences,” he emphasized during “Washington Watch” Tuesday. “… One is deception. You have health care workers and women thinking that they’re doing a good thing, but not really realizing they’re killing a baby. Then you’ve got lawlessness going on — this rebellion against the good sound laws is fomenting lawlessness in our land, which is very, very, very dangerous for the future of our nation and the ability for us to maintain peace and order within our own borders here. But also, … I think some of the impacts that get lost [are the effects] on the women who are pregnant, [the] mothers and the dads of those babies [at] universities, like in Oregon.”

Mary Szoch, who serves as director of the Center for Human Dignity at Family Research Council, further underscored the dangers and injustices that universities are unleashing by supplying the abortion drug to students.

“Schools like the University of Oregon should recognize that dispensing the abortion pill on campus is the same as pressuring a woman to have an abortion,” she told The Washington Stand. “It’s an act that is complicit in not only taking the life of and completely denying the dignity of an unborn child, but also, one that tells female students they must surrender their ability to be a mom in order to graduate. Colleges that engage in this are effectively telling students this school is one where being a woman is considered a burden, and becoming a mom is considered a failure.”

“Equally as bad is that as these colleges send this perverse message, they are putting women’s lives at risk — leaving them alone, likely in their door room, to deal with the trauma of delivering what may be their visibly recognizable dead child, while assessing whether the excruciating pain and immense bleeding they are experiencing is a ‘normal’ part of a mifepristone abortion or a life threatening emergency,” Szoch added. “That’s not the college experience women want, and women should take a stand by boycotting the University of Oregon and any other college that clearly doesn’t value the dignity of every person.”


Dan Hart is senior editor at The Washington Stand, a news division of the Family Research Council.

 

Taking the lives of unborn human beings, made in the image of God, is glorified and celebrated by a large segment of our society. The rejection of God’s moral standards for sex paved the way for this startling “loss of natural affection” in our culture (2 Timothy 3:1-3)—just as it had in ancient societies that would sacrifice babies conceived from sexually depraved rituals (Deut. 12:31).

The deceit of Democrat-led Government agencies, media, schools, and entertainment has also played a key role in the abortion agenda.

Women have been told lies about the reality of life in the womb. While left-leaning groups claimed that unborn babies are merely “clumps of cells,” they also advocated for women not to be shown ultrasound images of their children prior to abortions.

Abortion pills—especially with safeguards removed—offered a perfect scenario to block women from coming to realize the human life they would be destroying. In the cases where women reconsidered their decision, Democrats also worked overtime to demonize Pro-Life groups offering women the chance to reverse the process after taking the first of the two-pill regimen.

Like so many other issues in our culture, this is a spiritual battle. Jesus warned that Satan is “the father of lies” and a “murderer from the beginning” (John 8:44).

The agenda pushing for abortion has been framed as a matter of “Women’s rights.” Nothing could be further from the truth. Those advocating for the murder of unborn human beings have shown their true colors. They don’t care about women—their desire is the demonic destruction of life at any cost.

give

The Clash Of Worldviews: Secular Progressivism Vs Biblical Christianity

To understand the age in which we live, it is important to understand the ideas behind secular progressivism and, more importantly, what its aspirations are. After all, whether the majority of people realise it or not, secular progressivism has the stated goal of organising social life (with or without your consent) toward explicitly chosen goals. Those goals, however, put it in direct conflict with Biblical truth. The major flaw in secular progressivism is its belief that preference trumps truth. Because the maxim of this ideology is that “all preferences are created equal,” any belief which competes with somebody’s “preference” is treated in one of two ways. Either it must be suppressed (usually with the backing of government or media institutions), or it must be branded as a private hobby which is acceptable in the home or inner thought life but not welcome in the public square where others may be influenced by it.

How Allegory Reduces The Bible To Nothing More Than A Work Of Fiction

It is God alone who predicts the future. Prophecy is one of God’s signatures that tells us that we can trust in Him and His Word. It is what separates the Bible from all other religious writings in the world. But if we consistently use allegorical hermeneutics, as Charles Ryrie points out, then in effect what we have just done is reduce the Bible to nothing more than a work of fiction. How tragic! With hermeneutics like that, it is no wonder so many people want nothing to do with Bible prophecy. It is no wonder pastors refuse to preach and teach events concerning the future, and it is no wonder it can be so hard to understand.

sign up

Jan Markell: You Can’t Have A Genuine Revival With False Doctrine Raging

I hear a dozen evangelists stating that we are on the verge of a great revival. One self-proclaimed prophet says that a billion souls will come to faith in the coming weeks and months. If my Rapture is imminent, how can there be an imminent revival? Which is it? The Bible does talk about a coming revival. The question concerns its timing. Is it in the coming days, or is it after the Rapture when the “left behind” world realizes they should have listened to believers like you and me, get a second chance, and multitudes come to faith?

ABC's of Salvation

Decision

UTT

FOI

untitled artwork

Israel My Glory

Reports surfaced last week that the University of Oregon will begin offering the abortion pill to students directly from its on-campus health center in the fall of 2026. The college became the latest in a succession of universities that have recently begun offering the drug on campus, which experts say poses extreme physical and mental health dangers to women and increases the chances of them being coerced into aborting their babies.

As reported by Live Action on Monday, the University of Oregon’s University Health Services (UHS) has decided to begin supplying the chemical abortion regimen of mifepristone and misoprostol to students on campus after an extended pressure campaign conducted by a coalition of leftist student organizations, including the Young Democratic Socialists of America. During an interview, UHS Director Margaret Trout admitted that the university initially did not want to offer the abortion pill because UHS was not able to carry out surgical abortions if the chemical abortion failed.

But eventually, the student organizations’ pressure campaign worked, and UHS changed its mind. Associated Students of the University of Oregon (ASUO) President Prissila Moreno, who led the campaign, called the decision a “huge win for student power.” The cost of the abortion pill will be fully covered for students who have health insurance in the state due to Oregon’s Reproductive Health Equity Act, which mandates all state health insurance providers to cover 100% of abortion costs.

As observed by Live Action’s Carole Novielli, “Already facing financial and educational pressures as well as potential pressure from parents or the baby’s father, having the abortion 100% paid for adds an additional push to have an abortion that the student may not want.”

The University of Oregon joins a rapidly expanding list of colleges across the country that are now supplying the abortion drug to students on campus. California became the first state to pioneer the practice, passing a measure that took effect in January 2023 that requires all 33 public universities in the state to dispense abortion pills. Other universities that supply chemical abortion to students include the University of Illinois Chicago, the University of Massachusetts Amherst, and Portland State University.

The development comes amid a legal battle currently raging between pro-life states and the Trump administration over its decision not to enforce a federal law that prohibits the distribution of abortion pills through the mail and its reluctance to reverse Biden-era moves that stripped away safeguards that regulated the drug’s dispensation.

Pro-life advocates like Global Life Campaign Founder Thomas Jacobson say that there are a multitude of serious consequences that will occur as a result of the federal government allowing the abortion drug to spread.

[T]here’s enormous efforts to unleash the abortion pill upon our nation without thinking, without really dealing with the consequences,” he emphasized during “Washington Watch” Tuesday. “… One is deception. You have health care workers and women thinking that they’re doing a good thing, but not really realizing they’re killing a baby. Then you’ve got lawlessness going on — this rebellion against the good sound laws is fomenting lawlessness in our land, which is very, very, very dangerous for the future of our nation and the ability for us to maintain peace and order within our own borders here. But also, … I think some of the impacts that get lost [are the effects] on the women who are pregnant, [the] mothers and the dads of those babies [at] universities, like in Oregon.”

Mary Szoch, who serves as director of the Center for Human Dignity at Family Research Council, further underscored the dangers and injustices that universities are unleashing by supplying the abortion drug to students.

“Schools like the University of Oregon should recognize that dispensing the abortion pill on campus is the same as pressuring a woman to have an abortion,” she told The Washington Stand. “It’s an act that is complicit in not only taking the life of and completely denying the dignity of an unborn child, but also, one that tells female students they must surrender their ability to be a mom in order to graduate. Colleges that engage in this are effectively telling students this school is one where being a woman is considered a burden, and becoming a mom is considered a failure.”

“Equally as bad is that as these colleges send this perverse message, they are putting women’s lives at risk — leaving them alone, likely in their door room, to deal with the trauma of delivering what may be their visibly recognizable dead child, while assessing whether the excruciating pain and immense bleeding they are experiencing is a ‘normal’ part of a mifepristone abortion or a life threatening emergency,” Szoch added. “That’s not the college experience women want, and women should take a stand by boycotting the University of Oregon and any other college that clearly doesn’t value the dignity of every person.”


Dan Hart is senior editor at The Washington Stand, a news division of the Family Research Council.

 

Taking the lives of unborn human beings, made in the image of God, is glorified and celebrated by a large segment of our society. The rejection of God’s moral standards for sex paved the way for this startling “loss of natural affection” in our culture (2 Timothy 3:1-3)—just as it had in ancient societies that would sacrifice babies conceived from sexually depraved rituals (Deut. 12:31).

The deceit of Democrat-led Government agencies, media, schools, and entertainment has also played a key role in the abortion agenda.

Women have been told lies about the reality of life in the womb. While left-leaning groups claimed that unborn babies are merely “clumps of cells,” they also advocated for women not to be shown ultrasound images of their children prior to abortions.

Abortion pills—especially with safeguards removed—offered a perfect scenario to block women from coming to realize the human life they would be destroying. In the cases where women reconsidered their decision, Democrats also worked overtime to demonize Pro-Life groups offering women the chance to reverse the process after taking the first of the two-pill regimen.

Like so many other issues in our culture, this is a spiritual battle. Jesus warned that Satan is “the father of lies” and a “murderer from the beginning” (John 8:44).

The agenda pushing for abortion has been framed as a matter of “Women’s rights.” Nothing could be further from the truth. Those advocating for the murder of unborn human beings have shown their true colors. They don’t care about women—their desire is the demonic destruction of life at any cost.

Trusted Analysis From A Biblical Worldview

Help reach the lost and equip the church with the living and active truth of God's Word in our world today.

YOU CARE ABOUT

BIBLICAL TRUTH. SO DO WE.

 

Together, We Can Deliver A Biblical Understanding

Of News Events Around The World.

The Clash Of Worldviews: Secular Progressivism Vs Biblical Christianity

To understand the age in which we live, it is important to understand the ideas behind secular progressivism and, more importantly, what its aspirations are. After all, whether the majority of people realise it or not, secular progressivism has the stated goal of organising social life (with or without your consent) toward explicitly chosen goals. Those goals, however, put it in direct conflict with Biblical truth. The major flaw in secular progressivism is its belief that preference trumps truth. Because the maxim of this ideology is that “all preferences are created equal,” any belief which competes with somebody’s “preference” is treated in one of two ways. Either it must be suppressed (usually with the backing of government or media institutions), or it must be branded as a private hobby which is acceptable in the home or inner thought life but not welcome in the public square where others may be influenced by it.

How Allegory Reduces The Bible To Nothing More Than A Work Of Fiction

It is God alone who predicts the future. Prophecy is one of God’s signatures that tells us that we can trust in Him and His Word. It is what separates the Bible from all other religious writings in the world. But if we consistently use allegorical hermeneutics, as Charles Ryrie points out, then in effect what we have just done is reduce the Bible to nothing more than a work of fiction. How tragic! With hermeneutics like that, it is no wonder so many people want nothing to do with Bible prophecy. It is no wonder pastors refuse to preach and teach events concerning the future, and it is no wonder it can be so hard to understand.

untitled artwork 6391

Jan Markell: You Can’t Have A Genuine Revival With False Doctrine Raging

I hear a dozen evangelists stating that we are on the verge of a great revival. One self-proclaimed prophet says that a billion souls will come to faith in the coming weeks and months. If my Rapture is imminent, how can there be an imminent revival? Which is it? The Bible does talk about a coming revival. The question concerns its timing. Is it in the coming days, or is it after the Rapture when the “left behind” world realizes they should have listened to believers like you and me, get a second chance, and multitudes come to faith?

ABC's of Salvation

TV AD

worldview matters

Decision Magazine V AD

Decision

Jan Markell

Israel My Glory

Erick Stakelbeck

untitled artwork

YOU CARE ABOUT

BIBLICAL TRUTH.

SO DO WE.

Together, We Can Deliver A Biblical Understanding Of News Events Around The World And Equip The Church To Stand With A Biblical Worldview.

untitled artwork

Israel My Glory

YOU CARE ABOUT

BIBLICAL TRUTH.

SO DO WE.

 

Together, We Can Deliver A Biblical Understanding Of News Events Around The World And Equip The Church To Stand With A Biblical Worldview.