Is critical race theory (CRT) making a comeback in classrooms?
Banned in several red states, CRT is often described by those holding more progressive worldviews as an academic framework meant to examine “systemic racism.” Critics, however, would classify it as an ideological agenda that promotes racism — hence why many Republican-led states have taken steps to keep it out of their school curricula. Yet, a new report from the conservative Foundation for Freedom Online (FF) warns that CRT is quietly sneaking its way back in through the “media literacy” campaign.
According to FFO, Media Literacy Now (MLN) is the nonprofit in question, and it “advocates for media & digital literacy lessons” in K-12 schools with one primary goal: to train children on what sources are trustworthy and which spout “disinformation.” The problem, opponents argue, is that this nonprofit predominantly classifies conservative outlets as “unreliable” while lifting progressive ones. According to analysis from the Media Research Center, Ad Fontes Media flagged 64% of left-leaning outlets as reliable while only stating the same for 32% of conservative outlets. Notably, Ad Fontes’s CEO and president is on MLN’s board.
FFO described MLN as “arguably the most influential such nonprofit in the U.S., with paid advocacy leaders in 23 states, including Arizona, Indiana, Texas, Tennessee, Montana, North Carolina, and Utah.”
It turns out MLN was funded in part by grants from the Biden administration and a number of government agencies. For example, FFO noted that “the nonprofit was directly funded by the State Department to promote media literacy overseas” — with MLN receiving a $30,000 grant from the department to promote its objectives in Germany. Domestically, the Biden administration supported MLN’s material through the federal government’s “information literacy taskforce,” which included the following federal agencies:
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
- Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency
- Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
- Institute of Museum and Library Services
- Library of Congress
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration
- National Institutes of Health
- National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
- National Telecommunications and Information Administration
- Social Security Administration
- Department of Education
- Department of State
- Department of the Treasury
- Department of Veterans Affairs
This web of agencies reveals how deeply embedded MLN is within the federal government. The CDC, for one, “cited MLN’s media-literacy resources in publications released as part of its $1.5 million taxpayer-funded initiative to promote media literacy,” FFO highlighted. In 2022, Senator Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.) introduced the Digital Citizenship and Media Literacy Act, which quoted MLN in the text and was ultimately endorsed by MLN. Even though it ultimately failed to pass, it included a request for a $20 million slush fund for the Department of Education to fuel this so-called “media literacy” training in schools across the country.
So, what exactly does MLN’s “anti-disinformation” curriculum entail? Delving into its partnerships and affiliates is telling. As stated, MLN works alongside Ad Fontes, an organization known for producing “media bias” charts that have deemed outlets like Fox News and the New York Post as “hyper-partisan” and “unreliable.” An op-ed published by the head of MLN’s New Jersey chapter accused the Daily Caller, a mainstream conservative outlet, of “traffic[king] in lies and conspiracy theories.” Meanwhile, the National Review had received a nod of approval.
Moreover, one Pennsylvania-based MLN researcher, R. Alan Berry, argued that the “fight for media literacy” directly correlates with “the fight for critical race theory in schools.” In a chapter included in an academic book, Berry claimed that mainstream outlets, allegedly guilty of “misinformation and fake news… [fail] to connect news media and race.” And his solution? “[T]he creation of a media education program that will create an intersection between critical race theory, news literacy, and fake news.”
Even more troubling are MLN’s ties to the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC). In fact, MLN’s curricula are often penned by the SPLC, which is infamous for branding conservative and Christian organizations as “hate groups.” Family Research Council, for example, was listed on SPLC’s “hate map” in 2010, which prompted a gunman to enter the FRC headquarters two years later with the intent to kill as many employees as possible.
Ultimately, FFO’s report landed on this consensus: “MLN has become a de facto government-adjacent speech-adjudication partner — but targeted not at adults, platforms, or foreign populations, but at American children inside the K-12 system.” It cautioned that “media literacy is not inherently problematic. But when ‘media literacy’ is operationalized as a tool for political gatekeeping, backed by federal agencies, and implemented through nonprofit networks with explicit ideological alignments, the risk becomes clear: The classroom becomes an extension of the government’s preferred information narratives.”
In response to FFO’s findings, Joseph Backholm, FRC’s senior fellow for Biblical Worldview and Strategic Engagement, offered an insightful perspective in a comment to The Washington Stand. He explained that the “ideologically-slanted” information “being placed in schools … [is] unavoidable.” While “it is possible to present information objectively so that you’re honestly representing both sides of an issue … neutrality doesn’t exist. Even the idea that objectivity is desirable is a biased position that comes from certain beliefs about what is preferable and what isn’t.”
